Do every child have same potentiality? Are every students equally adept at every field? While some assert that every child must be taught the same curriculum until they enter college, other state that it is when they are thaught the interest of their choice, the their knowledge will be fruitful. After weighing an evidence it is certain that it is when the students refrain to follow the common curriculum during their childhood, they are more productive for the nation because the field of their interest is much more perfected easily than the boring subjetcs. Of course, with the more enthusiastic effort and predisposition to the field of own interest which they like to study about.
One who favors following the national curriculum may point to the fact that most of the developed nations follow this method which has proved to be more effective and has allowed the students to have at least basic knowledge in every field. It's no doubt that the subjects that students learn as a national curriculum aid to gain fundamental knowledge about every field and make them literate even they donot continue to study further. Nonetheless, the subjetcs learned before the college are not much practiced during their higher studies and the knowledge starts to diminish slowly due to lack of constant practice. Moreover, the students during college get more focused in the specific field during their study and loose interest and forget every thing they had learned earlier.
Now consider the case where a gifted child are evaluated for their proficiency and taught in a specific school by the government of USA from their earlier childhood. However, this system is not effectively adopted all across the nation, the child who has studied at this environment has proved to be more productive than the child who studied traditional curriculum. The child gets an opportunity to participate and get more focused in the specific field on which he had huge interest and prodigy since childhood. This will not only improve the enthusiasm in learning but also help to shape the perfect future of a child converting them into the perfect professional.
Similarly, the reports published by Japanese Ministry Of Education has recently disclosed that the child who learned at the specific curriculum from his school were found to be in more higher position than the ones studying national curriculum. They also found that half of the students turned out to be an entreprenuer under which the top students of conventional curriculumn are working. Had they not studied their field of interest from their childhood and engaged in national curriculm, they would refrain from studing seriously due to lack of interest and we couldn't imagine the position they would be as of now.
Ultimately, it is clear that a nation should encourage students to study their own field of interest since childhood they to force them studying same syllabus throughout the country.The study system applied by the government of USA and Japan in sample of students are no doubt the sheer practise of refraining national curriculum. The knowledge gained during this practice are much focused and practiced frequently, whereas the knowledge gained during studying common national curriculum are only ephemeral and start vanishing proportional to increase in time. If anything, national curriculm only serves to lose focus on study and make the subjects uninteresting due to diverse subjects putting pressure on the mind of small child.
- dsffdsfdsfds 16
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."The population on Balmer Island increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balm 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- “The powerful are most respected not when they exercisetheir power, but when they refrain from exercising it.” 50
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...e thaught the interest of their choice, the their knowledge will be fruitful. After weigh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...t least basic knowledge in every field. Its no doubt that the subjects that student...
^^^
Line 4, column 181, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...lum from his school were found to be in more higher position than the ones studying nationa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 564, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...eriously due to lack of interest and we couldnt imagine the position they would be as o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ng same syllabus throughout the country.The study system applied by the government ...
^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... practice are much focused and practiced frequently, whereas the knowledge gained...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, similarly, so, thus, whereas, while, at least, no doubt, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2928.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 568.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15492957746 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65993103081 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443661971831 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 909.9 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.9986149443 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.105263158 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8947368421 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333058366175 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106713948451 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810370990607 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203969151385 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704613854326 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.