Among students around the world, the standardized scores of US students on average are subpar and do not contest to students in the EU or Asia. This has led to various changes in the education system. Some have considered the implementation of a standardized national curriculum for all students to follow. However, I believe that this idea isn't practical for the two following reasons.
First, a general education system can waste time that impedes a student's interests. One of the classes I struggled in high school was English - literary analysis didn't come to me as well as my peers. Despite the fact that I was interested in the STEM field, I spent most of my time reading literary books and stressing over how to analyze it. This time could have been spent on my interests. I could have explored the stem field and discover fields that could enrich my knowledge and heighten my passion for the field of STEM.
Furthermore, a career-oriented school may seem to encourage students to focus on studies. Schools in Taiwan and Korea provide schools in various specific fields, such as entertainment (dancing, acting, singing), STEM, and other fields. For the case of entertainment school, these students only learn up to basic math and sufficient language comprehension. But they heavily focus on their careers. Dancers can spend long hours refining their art because they have the time to do so and not be bogged down by the obligations of unnecessary and irrelevant classes. Because of this, the Korean entertainment industry has produced some amazing actresses, dancers, and singers. This comes from the opportunity to explore and put time into their art/professions.
In the end, implementing a national curriculum in high school isn't the best solution to better US education. It's true that these career-oriented schools come with a cost: students won't have the breadth knowledge. However, I believe encouraging students to dive deep into knowledge that perks their interests will drive them to learn and succeed is the most important thing.
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
- "A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the posi 50
- 'The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the c 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...llow. However, I believe that this idea isnt practical for the two following reasons...
^^^^
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... school was English - literary analysis didnt come to me as well as my peers. Despite...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for the field of STEM. Furthermore, a career-oriented school may seem to encou...
^^
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ng a national curriculum in high school isnt the best solution to better US educatio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 337.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08902077151 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92506610084 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566765578635 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3323751155 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.2631578947 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7368421053 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0930407632243 0.243740707755 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316161360399 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399592963298 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652556001537 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384115959759 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.