A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The statement made by the author suggests that any nation should require all of its students to study the common national curriculum until they enter their graduation life. I somewhere agree with the recommendation made by the writer.
For example, consider the case where a child, whose father works in Indian Central Government or some military forces, acquires education being a student of any school located in his native region. Considering this, it might be possible that his father is relocated in every two years and posted to some different place or city. Hence, if a child studying in quite different curriculum and never studied in common nation unfamiliar and different curriculum might affect the child's academic performance. Also, it might be possible that after getting demoted to a lower academic level, the student takes it emotionally and because of this, his morale might plummet. Hence, accepting a common national curriculum would help to avoid such situation.
Also, take into consideration, for instance, two different education protocol, Curriculum A and Curriculum B, existing in a particular region. The schools which adopted Curriculum A decided to introduce new format of questions in examination paper and thus, keeping in mind the student's performance level, started giving multiple choice questions (MCQs). Whereas, on the other hand, schools following Curriculum B decided to slightly increase their examination paper's level to enhance the students capabilities. However, it might be possible that the students giving MCQs achieve more marks than the one who gave examinations under Curriculum B or vice versa. This would create a biased situation, where it might result in lowering the confidence among the students. To dodge this situation, a common national curriculum can augment the education system and hence, could avoid disparity among students and various schools.
However, some might argue that, what if a common national curriculum downgrade the innate talent of student? What if a student, bounds himself to such common curriculum and decided to stop thinking some new and innovative? But, these questions could be well answered by ameliorating the functioning and rules of national curriculum itself. The national common education system, being impartial, might provide extra assistance to such students and also could provide them with extra resources and concern.
To conclude, every statement has two meanings. Some might debate 'for' and some might think 'against' it. But, regarding this particular statement, it is better to impose a same national curriculum to avoid various problematic situations, as aforementioned.
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- "According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic e 66
- The following appeared in a letter too the editor of a journal on environmental issues. "Over the past year, the Crust Copper Company (CCC) has purchased over 10,000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia. Mining copper on this land 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ion paper and thus, keeping in mind the students performance level, started giving multi...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'whereas', 'for example', 'for instance', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233766233766 0.240241500013 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.15367965368 0.157235817809 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.106060606061 0.0880659088768 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0281385281385 0.0497285424764 57% => OK
Pronouns: 0.038961038961 0.0444667217837 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0930735930736 0.12292977631 76% => OK
Participles: 0.0497835497835 0.0406280797675 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.83293391639 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.030303030303 0.030933414821 98% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.103896103896 0.0997080785238 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0367965367965 0.0249443105267 148% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0151515151515 0.0148568991511 102% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2674.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 410.0 452.878318584 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.52195121951 6.0361032391 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.443902439024 0.366273622748 121% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.341463414634 0.280924506359 122% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.263414634146 0.200843997647 131% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.168292682927 0.132149295362 127% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83293391639 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 219.290929204 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534146341463 0.48968727796 109% => OK
Word variations: 60.6764255291 55.4138127331 109% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.5 23.380412469 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.781999732 59.4972553346 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.7 141.124799967 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.380412469 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.65 0.674092028746 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 54.6463414634 51.4728631049 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.70588235294 1.64882698954 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323867606869 0.391690518653 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109847910291 0.123202303941 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0796497662219 0.077325440228 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.527328417287 0.547984918172 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.128227081148 0.149214159877 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114742406221 0.161403998019 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111261476602 0.0892212321368 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.287643133549 0.385218514788 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.102293300178 0.0692045440612 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214546410009 0.275328986314 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131610521308 0.0653680567796 201% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88274336283 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.