“A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the pos

Essay topics:

“A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Maintaining uniformity in curriculum at national level untill they enter their college is a pragmatic decision. It will help maintaining parity among students and authensity among schools.

To illustrate that let's us see an example, in India, we have a various curriculum CBSC, ICSE, and various state curriculum, because of this students face surfeit of difficulty while they prepare for various undergraduate or graduate exams like GRE, SAT. This is because various curriculum have different subjects and they do not maintain uniformity in their structure, which is very vital for various undergraduate or graduate exams. A student from CBSE will score good marks in all these exams, but a student from various other state curriculum will not be able to score good marks as his or her curriculum do not focus on english as other. So, maintaining uniformity in cources will definitely help students.

In addition, it will also help various colleges, as they will be able to correctly analyse students performance and will be able to compare their performance with other students, because of the same difficulty level of the exam. To illustrate that let's see an example, every year surpluos of people apply for GRE and each every one has different CGPA according to their curriculum. It become very difficult for colleges to scrutanize students just on the base of their CGPA, because let say a student has 8.9 out of 10 CGPA and a student has 7.8 out of 10 CGPA. It will be irrational to say that the format student has more critical thinking ability as compared to latter one, as they have given different exam, which has different difficulty levels. With aferomentioned example, we can cleary say that if the curriculum of both the student might have been same it would have been much easier for the college to deciede.

In sum, requiring all the student to study the same national curriculum untill they enter college will not only help students but it will also be helpful for all the unviersity in analysing the students. Maintaining same standards will help also help in maintaining the authensity and regulations in the schools.

Votes
Average: 5.7 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-01 Opak Pulu 54 view
2019-11-27 ryuha 83 view
2019-10-08 rogannithin 90 view
2019-09-14 kkkk_kkkk 83 view
2019-08-29 Amey Waghmode 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user bharti.sharma2792 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to maintain' or 'maintain'.
Suggestion: to maintain; maintain
...e is a pragmatic decision. It will help maintaining parity among students and authensity am...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nd various state curriculum, because of this students face surfeit of difficulty whi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
... CGPA according to their curriculum. It become very difficult for colleges to scrutani...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02808988764 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75394954588 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452247191011 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 566.1 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1066743882 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.692307692 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3846153846 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174668773249 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738290022691 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061479214366 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126821543116 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301146283342 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.