A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Which is the better approach to educate students before they join university: teaching same national curriculum or instilling different curriculums? While some of the critics might argue that a nation should design its courses as per the local milieu. Clearly, students should be taught diverse curriculum as per the local culture, tradition, and several other factors, they contend. However, as far as I am concerned, I adjure to teach same national curriculum to the students until they reach the tertiary level education.
Critics, supporting the opposite notion of this argument, might argue that during the early age of a child, he should be made well apprised of his local culture, tradition, and the environmental setting. Therefore, curriculum - before the university study - should be devised in such a way which enables a child to understand him thoroughly, recognizing his culture, tradition - which ultimately familiarizes him of his milieu, and hence contributes to recognize him the actual he. However, this judgement is rife with fallacies. Students who take national curriculum are also able to make out their culture, and the social settings. I, for example, am one of the student who took national curriculum during my early age; of course, I understand my social setting and I have further knowledge about other communities and their culture too. It means, studying same national curriculum have extra benefits, isn't it?
Now, consider the aspect of the argument I adhere: "a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college". There are few fundamental skills that is imperative to impart in all students during their early phase of learning. For example, during primary classes, students should learn same thing - like writing alphabetical letters and real numbers. Without studying these elementary courses, they won't be able to perform better in the future. In such stage, if these things are not taught, what else would be taught, if different curriculum would have been allowed? The same course would have been taught, right? As a result, advocating for different curriculum for such students is not logical cogent.
Similarly, before entering university, students learn all subjects: in Nepal we cover almost all basic concept of most of the major fields. Finally, we get enough time - and knowledge too, to decide the subject in which we want to specialize. For instance, I studied different courses during my secondary level and I opted to carryout my life ahead in physics, finally. Today, I think I took a good decision and one must be aware of the factor which assisted me to take this better decision, that is, my courses of secondary level. I studied concepts of different subjects, and finally elected physics as my major, for a tremendous fountain of interest emerged inside me toward this field.
To conclude, a nation should persuade all of its students to take same national curriculum before joining college. Contrary to the feeble arguments of critics, taking national curriculum has many vantages: some of the robust examples mentioned above (based on my own life experiences) are enough to substantiate this position.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-28 | MD. ASHRAFUL ISLAM | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | vincentsjwu | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | vismay0110 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | PrincewillOkosun | 50 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the compl 83
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free. 16
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society/country, It is adequate to study its major cities. 79
- Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based. 66
- Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation must be the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Reason: Great achievements by a nation's rulers, artists, or scientists will ensure a good life for the majority of that nation's people.Write a r 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...instilling different curriculums? While some of the critics might argue that a nation shoul...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 906, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ational curriculum have extra benefits, isnt it? Now, consider the aspect of the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 604, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...ould be taught, if different curriculum would have been allowed? The same course would have bee...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... we get enough time - and knowledge too, to decide the subject in which we want t...
^^
Line 9, column 207, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... national curriculum has many vantages: some of the robust examples mentioned above based o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'similarly', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'i think', 'of course', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.197324414716 0.240241500013 82% => OK
Verbs: 0.153846153846 0.157235817809 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.11872909699 0.0880659088768 135% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0418060200669 0.0497285424764 84% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0735785953177 0.0444667217837 165% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.105351170569 0.12292977631 86% => OK
Participles: 0.0384615384615 0.0406280797675 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.76774611302 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0284280936455 0.030933414821 92% => OK
Particles: 0.00167224080268 0.0016655270985 100% => OK
Determiners: 0.0769230769231 0.0997080785238 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0217391304348 0.0249443105267 87% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0167224080268 0.0148568991511 113% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3233.0 2732.02544248 118% => OK
No of words: 519.0 452.878318584 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.22928709056 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.58838876751 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.425818882466 0.366273622748 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.325626204239 0.280924506359 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.246628131021 0.200843997647 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.132947976879 0.132149295362 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76774611302 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 219.290929204 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512524084778 0.48968727796 105% => OK
Word variations: 61.5497907245 55.4138127331 111% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 21.625 23.380412469 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3460043047 59.4972553346 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.708333333 141.124799967 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 23.380412469 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.674092028746 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 54.1876204239 51.4728631049 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.26708074534 1.64882698954 77% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.508311765564 0.391690518653 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113127584944 0.123202303941 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.102118942085 0.077325440228 132% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.473513489512 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.14835695473 0.149214159877 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165949885301 0.161403998019 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15443878569 0.0892212321368 173% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.306689342209 0.385218514788 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0480755407675 0.0692045440612 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335968362214 0.275328986314 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114690409217 0.0653680567796 175% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88274336283 225% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 10.0 2.70907079646 369% => OK
Total topic words: 23.0 13.5995575221 169% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.