A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. has been updated.
The recommendation states that all students of a nation should study the same national curriculum. This gives rise to a question that how such national curriculum should be created. Furthermore, who is going to build that curriculum. While it seems that the same national curriculum will promote a good generalization among the students' study, it will also restrict the scope of education. I believe, considering logical reasons that such national curriculum will cause more harm than good.
Providing the same national curriculum to all of nation's students has a few benefits. Firstly, it promotes good standardization of the education system as all the students are going to follow the same curriculum, which in result, helps in development of healthy competetion among the students. Such kind of equality would not have been possible if nationalization of curriculum had not been there.
But, the standardization of the curriculum relies on more serious question of development of such curriculum. Because if all of the nation's students are going to follow the same curriculum then it should have good scope of different fields of education as well as proper depth to each subject. Producing this kind of curriculum is a really challanging task. Mainly because it restricts the knowledge given to students. Some students who like to learn art or music for example while other would prefer to learn more of science. Not if the curriculum has both subjects then all the students will have to study many subjects, which will cause more stress. This practise may result into more drop-outs or in severe cases, suicides.
On a differnent note, in nations with diverse culture, for example India, students from different parts would prefer to learn more about their own culture and languages. National curriculum can not properly accomodate such variaty. A student from one region might not interested in learning two differnt languages.
Ultimately, while keeping in mind the benefits of standard and equality, the effect of curriculum on students clearly weighs more. Hence, I conclude that a nation having national curriculum for all the students is not a very reasonable concept.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-06 | vismay0110 | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. has been updated. 50
- he diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared 77
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 16
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...elopment of such curriculum. Because if all of the nations students are going to follow th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, really, so, then, well, while, for example, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30659025788 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90699223491 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492836676218 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9336082397 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.45 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38105574359 0.243740707755 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14455820207 0.0831039109588 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131312513966 0.0758088955206 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256058547611 0.150359130593 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875837621043 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.