A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
Students are the future of any nation. Focusing on the adequate development of the children in their school life will decide the quality of engineers, doctors, scientists, etc. coming from our nation. That will subsequently affect the state of development of our country. I agree with this proposal of the same national curriculum for all the students of our nation. It will provide a fair platform to compete or judge the students across the nation, would ease quality control, and reduce the barriers in communication among the students across the country.
First, by having the scheme of a single curriculum for all the students will provide them a sense of belief that they are being taught, what everyone else is studying. They would not have any notion like students in developed cities or costly schools have advanced and more opportunistic curriculum. Also, they would not feel their syllabus is different from others in terms of difficulty or content, so there is no valid comparison applicable. This will put an end to all these considerations and will incur a sense of competition where all students would be ranked on a single platform.
Secondly, having a standard curriculum will help in easy management and quality administration. We can set up a central control board, which will look after the needs of schools across the country. Single Board of control will remove all the discrepancies and inefficiencies of the many regional boards currently present. It's hard to manage and maintain the quality of education in a dispersed system. We can also have experts for various aspects of academic development who would head the academic department of our country.
Finally, it would also reduce the communication gap we currently have among the students of different states. We can have mandatory subjects to be taught across the nation to enable this level of continuity in communication. For example, in a country like India, where we have various languages dominant in different states would be beneficial.
Overall, I would say this decision will improve the attitude of students towards education, provide opportunity for strong management and promote unification among the students of the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 66
- TOEFL integrated writing: Altruism 3
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in 90
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in an 49
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24581005587 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89121123408 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511173184358 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3484241072 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8421052632 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8421052632 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200325224781 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788858666246 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910878540911 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111690598433 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830293749372 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.