A nation should required all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college

Essay topics:

A nation should required all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Having uniformity in school national curriculum across the schools in a nation shall without doubt have its advantages - bringing level playing field to all the High schoolers prospecting to enter colleges in their subject specific interests, central control over syllabi of different subjects may help in regular and more up-to-date inclusion of modern developments around the world which in effect will help students to have more grip over the social changes happening around the world.

A student belonging to less fortunate household might inherently find it difficult to compete with someone with a more generous upbringing. Challenge lies first in getting admitted into a good College and then survival in this competitive environment. To help bring equal opportunites to everyone, curriculum uniformity might be of help. But this is only the tip of the iceberg- having similar curriculum in schools does not necessarily mean same quality of education being imparted in schools. That in turn depends on school machinery, qualitative proficiency of teachers and various other factors.

Having centralised control over curriculum by one apex body has its advantages and disadvantages. While having such apex body supervising over regular updation of school curriculum keeps student abreast of day to day modern advancements in technology and social issues, region specific cultures and issues cannot be properly addressed through such kind of curriculums. Hence, to have a more holistic approach, region specific information may be kept as a different party of region specific curriculum.

Although the above reasoning somewhat justifies having the recommendation of same curriculum across schools, it is imperative to ask as to what "same curriculum" shall entail. It is a well known fact that different students possess skills in different academic space. Having a syllabi that constrains a student proficient in a particular field to devote his time on his lesser interests might hinder the growth that the student may acheive when having option to study in his subject specialisation. This is to say that uniformity in curriculum should not merge in meaning with inflexibiliy for the same.

To summarise, while it will looks promising to inculcate same national curriculum across nation, minute aspects and nationwide ramification of the same might be analyzed in greater details to make sure innovative thinking, appreciation of state/region specific heritage and overall development of students is not challenged.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-03-06 vincentyoyo 62 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user banduni96 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a syllabus' or simply 'syllabi'?
Suggestion: a syllabus; syllabi
...lls in different academic space. Having a syllabi that constrains a student proficient in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 29, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'look'
Suggestion: look
...e same. To summarise, while it will looks promising to inculcate same national cu...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, look, may, so, then, well, while, as to, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2162.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61558441558 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05534336705 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568831168831 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 110.496560109 60.3974514979 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.428571429 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241501297115 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727260761824 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556354030427 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133918293106 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518085366943 0.0667264976115 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 14.1392134831 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 48.8420337079 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.