Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
The actions of humankind over the past few years are detrimental to mother earth, and dramatically worsen the environment by polluting air, water, depletion of the ozone layer, emission of hazardous gases into the air. While in the human’s hunger for globalization, industrialization we forgot about our environment and to take care of it. Moreover, to obtain the raw material for industries deforestation, degradation of the jungle to expand infrastructure, to set up factories we are a catalyst for climate change and global warming. But in underdeveloped countries, even they have preserved their wilderness they are maladjusted to use it in a beneficiary way for their people hence, I partly agree with the statement that nations should pass the law with certain circumstances and flexible regulations with organized and planned way.
Firstly, we are highly responsible to deteriorate our ecosystem in hunger for economic gain. Excessive setup of industries, building concrete jungles, augmenting carbon footprint, using nonrenewable sources of the energy results in climate change, melting of the glacier, and finally global warming. For example, if species like bees in the forest are eradicated, then the complete food chain will adversely be affected and will be one of the reasons for the destruction of humankind.
Secondly, on the other hand, we talked about sustainability with almost every sector of society but when it comes to the practical approach, we almost remain negligible for execution. Melting of the glacier and increasing water level going to affect us very soon. We must not forget that we are completely staunch on the environment.
On the contrary, countries in Africa which are underdeveloped, they completely depend on their forests and wilderness to feed their country. But again to develop on the global level they are sacrificing their preserved forest for economic gain.
In totality, countries which are almost developed or in the process of development must have rules and regulation to hinder the wilderness and on the other hand, underdeveloped countries should not completely eschew the regulations. There should be regulated and modulated guidelines in varying contexts and countries. While nature should be preserved “natural”, we should understand that the people of “today” should be respected as much as the people of “tomorrow”.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-01 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2024-07-09 | jiwon12 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-10 | Tammy__kk | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | rimpiG | 54 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | shubham1102 | 50 | view |
- The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the 73
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will in 73
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter the college 50
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather and lo 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 643, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a beneficiary way" with adverb for "beneficiary"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...lderness they are maladjusted to use it in a beneficiary way for their people hence, I partly agree ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48238482385 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2038595529 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563685636856 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8048009195 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.866666667 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 5.21951772744 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258821243941 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789097219707 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719762797463 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134911292058 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636757279277 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.