Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
I fundamentally agree with the proposition that Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, as it plays a very important role in maintaining the balance of our ecosystem. As looking only on the economic side of things and destroying wilderness can lead to imbalances in nature and can cause certain unwanted and extremely harmful hazards.
The primary reason why i agree with the proposition is that since a long time humans have been destroying wilderness just for the sake of their own economic gains and personal benefits. We have been destroying large amount of forests and cutting down trees in order to make factories and other buildings or use those land for purposes which would yield economic benefits to humans. A large numbers of animals and birds have lost their homes because of deforestation and are now homeless which exposes them to certain external threats like poaching. Many of the species of animals and birds have became endangered now because humans have been selfishly destroying their habitat and they end up being homeless or killed.
Moreover, there has been a lot of natural calamities due to the imbalances caused in nature by human actions like these. Pollution level are constantly increasing due to cutting down of trees and deforestation and at the same time increase of factories and industries plus release of harmful chemicals. The amount of green house gases in the atmosphere is also increasing which has lead to melting of ice in the polar regions causing the water levels to rise at a significant rate. Many rivers and sea are getting over flooded causing floods at a more frequent rate than before.
It is high time now that human should start thinking about the impacts of their actions on nature and the harm it is causing to the environment. However, the Governments and National Authorities plays a very significant role in this process, because unless and until strong laws are not passed to preserve wilderness humans will continue to harm it and use it for their own benefits. Certain Wilderness preserving Acts should be passed and the offenders of these acts should be punished in order to insure that these laws are followed properly and no further damage is caused to the wilderness which will also lead to preservation of certain endangered species.
To sum up, I totally agree with the proposition that Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state and not look at the economic benefits from them. As each and every little action that we take for its preservation is very important for the balance of our ecosystem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ful hazards. The primary reason why i agree with the proposition is that sinc...
^
Line 4, column 597, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...f the species of animals and birds have became endangered now because humans have been...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 501, Rule ID: INSURE_THAT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ensure' (=make sure)? 'Insure' means 'pay money to insurance company'.
Suggestion: ensure
...ese acts should be punished in order to insure that these laws are followed properly a...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtant for the balance of our ecosystem.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01121076233 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6631826027 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47533632287 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.3184289225 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7333333333 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289316170412 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990885207633 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890408347525 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181007639403 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961131280237 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.