Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Nature has generously provided everything for the very existence of all types of living organisms in this world, including human beings. With ever growing of human population it became inevitable to occupy wilderness for various reasons. It could be for apartments, factories, playgrounds, etc., At present it is realized that most of the wilderness areas are already occupied by humans and therefore it becomes essential for Nations to have some strict laws concerning prudent usage and preservation of wilderness areas.
Undoubtedly, Wilderness areas will have variety of flora and fauna. For example, unexplored areas in Amazon forest is said to be only place where many rare species of birds, insects and animals are found in the whole world. One plausible reason could be because the forest gives perfect ambience for the dwelling of those wild animals. Furthermore, all the species plays a vital role in maintaining the biodiversity of life and also the food chain. For example, small insects are eaten by rodents, rodents are eaten by snake, and snakes are eaten by mongoose and vultures and the food cycle goes on. There it becomes essential to save this biodiversity.
Secondly, the important reason for preserving these wilderness should be preserving the fertile soil for agriculture at least in some parts of the country. A report says that it has become almost impossible to grow any vegetation without the use of inorganic manures and pesticides. This could be because of overuse of fertile land. Additionally, more fertile lands which were used for farming once has become into a multi- storey apartments with all latest amenities. This persuades us to save the wilderness areas for the future.
Deforestation has become inevitable, both for human occupancy and for the production of various wood products. Forests which were unexplored once have become a city and a famous tourist site now. Does this offer good to humans holistically? To answer this question, one can look none other than our climate and season patterns for the past few years. NASA report declares that the average temperature of our planet has increased by 2 degrees in the past twenty years and it also warns that it expected to increase more and thereby posits that the planet is awaited for dangers of Global warming. Based on the facts of altered monsoons, rainfall patterns and strange natural calamities , one could not deny the major role played by deforestation. Therefore, we are in a delicate position to preserve the wilderness for better climate and rainfall.
Although, one can argue that we can utilize the wilderness areas by starting factories, which can increase employment among people, the above examples overrules any benefits which we obtain by utilizing wilderness areas. This brings to my conclusion that strict laws are necessary to preserve the wilderness areas in their natural state.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-15 | ShrutiUrkude | 58 | view |
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 83
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 34
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wilderness' or 'these wildernesses'?
Suggestion: this wilderness; these wildernesses
...ly, the important reason for preserving these wilderness should be preserving the fertile soil f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 684, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... patterns and strange natural calamities , one could not deny the major role playe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, at least, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20085470085 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73713036809 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547008547009 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 785.7 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0077051135 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.826086957 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.347826087 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21739130435 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302709146853 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849371339613 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685036590277 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174395649308 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036313036349 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.