No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Many would say that any field cannot advance significantly without corporates knowledge of other fields. Admittedly, I acknowledge there are huge merits we can get when bringing a new, fresh idea from outside of own field. However, I still disagree with the statement that no field of study can find breakthrough unless it integrates experience from outside the field.
Of course, there are many benefits we can get from interdisciplinary projects. When experts stock in an obsolete, rigid perspective in own field, different perspective would be helpful to think outside of the boxes. In addition, theories and findings in one field are also used to find solution to the problem in another field. In short, it is true that integration among two or more fields can contribute to progress of fields.
Nonetheless, the advantages of integration among fields do not necessarily indicate that outstanding improvement in a field can only be achieved by the integration between fields. The noteworthy findings can also be achieved in a relatively short period of time when the time comes after a lot of endeavors from experts have been accrued for a long time. In many fields, we can easily observe that a breakthrough suddenly comes out to the world after long period of no significant progress. For example, there is not much improvement in a data science field during last five decades, but after all algorithms and ideas accumulated by scholars, the data science field now reaches their heyday. The increased processing abilities of computer ignite the sudden improvement, but what makes it possible are hard works of the experts in the field.
Moreover, important feats can also be achieved after repeated experiments. After uncountable trial-and-errors and a series of modification of hypothesis, when an experiment finally succeeds, an accomplishment comes out to the world, which has potent to change the world. For instance, in physics, there are many examples of findings, such as law of gravity, the behavior of electronics, finding the existence of atom, all of which brought significant difference and have been widely used until these days. Those invaluable findings are achieved not by fresh ideas from outside the field, but by numerous experiments from diligent scientists.
In a nutshell, considering the rapid, enormous improvements that can achieve by repeated experiments and accumulated experience of professionals who engage in one field during the entire life, it is hard to agree with the given statement. Only by ignoring the all aforementioned factual examples can one say that outside the field experience and knowledge is the most critical factor of achieving substantial development of a field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | smithsonite79 | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Kyunghwan Kim | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | FaylEAVE0920 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | tuktuki1311 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | wwwww | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that success in creative fields, such as painting, fiction writing, andfilmmaking, primarily requires hard work and perseverance. Others believe that suchsuccess mainly requires innate talents that cannot be learned.Write a response in 75
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field. 83
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning. 62
- "A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the adver 55
- Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 248, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... also be achieved in a relatively short period of time when the time comes after a lot of ende...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, after all, for example, for instance, in addition, in short, of course, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2306.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32563510393 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07315940569 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5103926097 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0465630636 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.111111111 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0555555556 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.21951772744 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452793476227 0.243740707755 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148929565287 0.0831039109588 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110248365831 0.0758088955206 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284967022359 0.150359130593 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137157007477 0.0667264976115 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.