In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether a work of art has merit only if it is understandable to the majority of people. Indisputably, one requirement is the acceptance of the public when the experts are called to evaluate a creation of art. Nevertheless, the evaluation of a work of art is a multifaceted process and considers many factors which are more crucial than just the level of understanding from the side of the public. Thus, I generally disagree with the viewpoint that a work of art must be understandable in order to have value and I would argue that the merit of a creation of art is hardly to be estimated and contains many factors.
First of all, I would assert that many masterpieces of art are considered vague and obscure to their meanings and thus it is logical that many people are not able to understand their meanings. Consequently, the understanding of the artist’s creation cannot stand as a valuable qualification to evaluate the merit of the creation. For instance, one masterpiece in the art history is the famous painting Guernica by the Spanish painter, Pablo Picasso. However, this painting is so complicated and contains many obscure figures and it is impossible to grasp the meaning of them without the help of an expert in painting.
Admittedly, when the public understands the deeper notions and meanings of the artist, it embraces the artist and his/her creation and this public attributes merit and value in the creations of the artist. To illustrate, let us look at the example of the American singer Bob Dylan with his daily and common stories narrated in his songs, he touched the hearts of the American public.
In conclusion, it is my personal belief that the evaluation of a work of art is a difficult process and the merit of each creation is attributed by taking consideration varied factors like the technique of the artist or the affection to the other artists and not surely by considering just the easily connection among the work of art and the public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-26 | Jbrachael | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | seoul_milk | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-29 | seoul_milk | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-19 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 50 | view |
| 2022-04-06 | Saugat Basnet | 50 | view |
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 50
- Claim Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive Reason It is primarily in cities that a nation s cultural traditions are preserved and generated 50
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books We recommend that Monarch Books open a caf in its store Monarch having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years has a large customer base because it is 79
- Nature s Way a chain of stores selling health food and other health related products is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville The store should prove to be very successful Nature s Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas where re 68
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e estimated and contains many factors. First of all, I would assert that many m...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out the help of an expert in painting. Admittedly, when the public understands ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hed the hearts of the American public. In conclusion, it is my personal belief ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84393063584 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96847120761 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491329479769 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.9874687416 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.363636364 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4545454545 23.4991977007 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.21951772744 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172527629335 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696926295477 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595655574251 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101608236777 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06738217267 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.