In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f

Essay topics:

In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Art is a subjective matter when it comes to likes and dislikes. It's different forms like film, music, novel and poem have made it easy for and induvidual to express their feelings, views and logics to existing situation and their individual thoughts. The prompt suggests that art has merit when it is understandable by the most. I mostly disagree with the statement and argue that art has is's merit even when it is not understandable by the most fpr the followinf three reasons.
Art is a medium for expression. So, it is no important to understand the art to relish it. Bouncing back to 2010-2011 there was this singer from korea-PSY, who came up with the song Gangnam Style and broke all the records that existed before is release. Although, the song was in Korean language, a laymen with little or no understanding of Korean could enjoy the song. As the visuals were too good and funny. Moreover, is case of stand up comedy would you feel good and fun when you have to struggle to understand the joke. As most of the audience laugh as others are laughing.
Similarly, it enjoyment and personal interest has nothing to do with understanding. In art galleries of Italy and France, when a first timer tourist visits they despite of not knowing what is potrayed. The just go there to see famous scluptures-that the history has declared to be indespensible. a
Some might argue that art without undestanding serves no purpose. For an instance, presenter in comedy show has to incisive while creating the humour: moreover if the audience has to think too hard to understand then the joke, is of no importance.
In conclusion, in some cases the understanding of art might be good, but, mostly it must be able to the deliver the feelings of creator despite it being of any language or culture.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-26 Jbrachael 66 view
2023-09-30 seoul_milk 75 view
2023-09-29 seoul_milk 58 view
2022-09-19 Kalyani_tekade_24 50 view
2022-04-06 Saugat Basnet 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Saugat Basnet :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 42, Rule ID: IT_IS_NO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not' or 'now'?
Suggestion: not; now
...t is a medium for expression. So, it is no important to understand the art to reli...
^^
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a layman' or simply 'laymen'?
Suggestion: a layman; laymen
...hough, the song was in Korean language, a laymen with little or no understanding of Kore...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...story has declared to be indespensible. a Some might argue that art without unde...
^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...be good, but, mostly it must be able to the deliver the feelings of creator despite it bein...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, while, as to, in conclusion, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73482428115 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78710369445 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578274760383 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1450491231 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1764705882 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271618234806 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760865669526 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558467494343 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129793890743 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065768702343 0.0667264976115 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 48.8420337079 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 12.1743820225 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.