In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business matters.
Its the age of start-ups. We see a lot of emerging start-ups with brilliant innovative ideas which can truly make the world a better place to live. It is often very difficult for a any common person to keep track of which ideas can actually benefit the society. This is where the role of government comes in. Initiatives by government to identify potential start-ups can be a huge boom for a state or a country's economy.
Sometimes,the government keeps their vision limited to big private corporate companies which make billions of investment. Now, it is no way possible that a handful of private company employees think about the benefit of the society and as well as their company's profit. This often leads to lack of innovation in the society taking us no where and the government's money, ergo common man's money is at stake. What good will the partnership between big private businesses do if there is no return on investment for the people? It is these times where the government should shift focus towards small business start-ups and encourage them to build their company. This not only brings in more ideas to the table by new people, but also brings in healthy competition in the market.
However, to what extent should the government be helping these small businesses? To answer that, we would really need to understand the economic status of the government. If it can afford funding a huge number of small businesses, then it goes without saying that it can boost up the employment opportunities to many. But if they can't, then they really need to focus on selecting a handful of really potential businesses and help them grow.
To conclude, we can agree up on the fact that monetary funds available with the government plays a key factor in determining whether or not to fund the small business enterprise. However, if they have to increase the number of small business enterprise to bring in more ideas and improve the state of the society, then they should increase their support towards them and encourage them, which would essentially mean that they have to minimize their relation with private enterprises. But, this does not mean that they should break their ties with private enterprise completely. It means that they should reduce their role whenever they need a solution for a problem and if a small start-up can solve them efficiently, then they should give them a chance. In the end, its not about bringing up more small businesses, It is about who can solve the country's problem with a least amount of resources and new ideas.
- In order to help small businesses thrive government should play a minimal role in private business matters 30
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 50
- Schools should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood. 75
- "We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whoseviews contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning." 50
- In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business matters. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
Its the age of start-ups. We see a lot of e...
^^^
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...to live. It is often very difficult for a any common person to keep track of whic...
^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...tate or a countrys economy. Sometimes,the government keeps their vision limited t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... of innovation in the society taking us no where and the governments money, ergo c...
^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... the society taking us no where and the governments money, ergo common mans money is at sta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to fund'.
Suggestion: to fund
...tus of the government. If it can afford funding a huge number of small businesses, then...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ment opportunities to many. But if they cant, then they really need to focus on sele...
^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...nment plays a key factor in determining whether or not to fund the small business enterprise. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 768, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... should give them a chance. In the end, its not about bringing up more small busine...
^^^
Line 7, column 869, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...who can solve the countrys problem with a least amount of resources and new ideas...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, really, so, then, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85159817352 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63018157782 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481735159817 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.014793465 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246297864364 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078510208076 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820210450588 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14753785968 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594333582642 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.