In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach

Essay topics:

In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach

Some top universities and colleges require their faculty members to work outside of academic world in the aim of practicing viable issues, accordingly, being qualified with more valuable factual experiences and advises further than theoretical background. Importance of academic world and some possible inefficient time allocations of this policy aside, I agree with this application since we observe positive feedbacks from graduates of these school.
While some particular jobs are based on market strategies, recent technologies and innovative ideas, it is not rational to charge students with just burden of theoretical stuff. To put it another way, the key of success in some fields is keeping up ongoing speed and changes rather than bonding and assimilating old theories. There a good academic will be the one who can give concrete real advises. For instance, a good colleague in advertisement, Bob Johnson, has given many lectures and during these period has worked on various agents to observe what is going on. This is important in the sense that student can adapt more easily and get aroused by feeling ready to directly involve into market. Otherwise, in their first jobs, they may feel unqualified or impractical, although they realize somethings just get time in further.
Recent studies show that colleges which involve theory intense educations become successful in research methodologies but fail in corporate and public sectors. Theory is full of assumptions, conditions in the aim of getting desired results, effects, however, real life have far more convoluted obstacles instead. It is important to learn also how you can face and fight with these obstacles and how you partner with your colleagues in these process of risk management. Most academics are not able to give real life illustrations even though they can immensely explain and develop proof and logic of theory. For instance, a proper civil engineering academics should be able to give possible unfortunates and they manage this process. This illustrates that civil engineer academic should involve in construction areas in order to observe meticulously.
Last point I agree with the statement that this application also feeds and rises new research areas since scholars will see some problems to resolve or ameliorate, accordingly, they could give advices their students new questions, new technics to work on. For instance, most famous scholar of architecture in Turkey, Deniz Yılmaz, who is currently giving lectures in Istanbul Technical University, has a habit of giving her students projects which require their students to contemplate and provide a solution for a current challenge in architecture of Turkey rather than designing discrete buildings. This improves practice of students and serves as an opportunity to apply what they have learned.
On the other hand, this application may cause some problems in time managements of these academics since it is not easy all the time to conduct and concentrate on a research effectively, therefore, allocating efficient time to these professional occasions may decrease. As an illustration, physicians who is supposed to focus on abstract and theoretical subjects should mainly work on research to catch up new discoveries and provide valuable advices and suggestions rather than occasional examples during their lectures.
In conclusion, all things considered, I agree with the statement beyond its possible negative drawbacks. It is well-advised for universities and colleges to require their faculty members to work outside of academic world for getting them qualified with more valuable factual experiences and advises further than theoretical background.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-06 seonjungkim 50 view
2019-06-13 SOUMEDHIK 50 view
2017-09-15 elifyeg 83 view
2017-09-15 elifyeg 83 view
2017-09-15 elifyeg 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user elifyeg :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3135.0 2235.4752809 140% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50966608084 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95430214043 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523725834798 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 985.5 704.065955056 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1420803738 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.285714286 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0952380952 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186701903588 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563185023569 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556545474707 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108411385157 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503737023581 0.0667264976115 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 170.0 100.480337079 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.