The author states that, people as individual encouraged to embrace uniqueness and consequently there is a decline in his/her social belonging, where he/she fails to see similarities between his peers. I strongly disagree with the authors claims and put forth the following point to bolster my view.
Firstly, with the advent of media and social networking an individual is a click away from connecting to his peers, even outside his circle of influence. He/She can view and provide insights on each others views. A person is drawn to point of view of another individual and sees similarities in his/her thought process. Consequently, this leads to him either accepting or discarding one another views on the subject. This encourages him/her to form bonds among individuals in the society.
Furthermore, global concerns like pollution, war and deforestation bring about a sense of togetherness, as these problems cannot be resolved as individuals, but can only be solved as a community working towards finding a solution. An apt example is Earth Hour participation around the world, where a major percentage of population around the world participates to bring down the consumption of electricity by switching off all electrical appliances for a stipulated duration. When we see a common cause we look beyond our individuality and participate to help in the greater cause.
Finally, humans celebrate international sporting events with great fervour and joy. These events bring all participating nations and citizens of the countries together on a platform where each participant is treated equally immaterial of which province they belong to. Even representatives of nations at war come together and embrace their similarity, that is the love for the sport. They compete to win and bring glory to the nation but also treat their counterparts from other nations with respect they deserve. These events mark the uniqueness of each athlete but also highlights that we are similar and an extended family.
To conclude, the society divides us based on various differences, but it is this amalgamation that burnishes and brings out the best in us. How we strive to see meaningful similarities, even among our differences is a strong quality only humans can embrace. Our strength lies in our core values as a society, the value of seeing similarities among our peers.
- Teacher's salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students. 70
- A recent survey of 250 adults between the ages of 30 and 45 showed an association between the number of hours adults spend online each day and self-reporting of symptoms commonly associated with depression. The survey found that adults who spend 30 hours 75
- "The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors: "Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term. We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed satell 66
- Issue: So long as they are aware of the dangers involved, Adults should not be legally bound to use seat belts. 66
- People have been so encouraged by society to focus on apparent differences that they fail to see meaningful similarities among ideas, individuals and groups. 58
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'if', 'look', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236842105263 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.157894736842 0.157235817809 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.055023923445 0.0880659088768 62% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0454545454545 0.0497285424764 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0789473684211 0.0444667217837 178% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.11961722488 0.12292977631 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0358851674641 0.0406280797675 88% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.03212422423 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0334928229665 0.030933414821 108% => OK
Particles: 0.00717703349282 0.0016655270985 431% => OK
Determiners: 0.11004784689 0.0997080785238 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00956937799043 0.0249443105267 38% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0167464114833 0.0148568991511 113% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2370.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 383.0 452.878318584 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.18798955614 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.383812010444 0.366273622748 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287206266319 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.206266318538 0.200843997647 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.148825065274 0.132149295362 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03212422423 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 219.290929204 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595300261097 0.48968727796 122% => OK
Word variations: 71.1412670104 55.4138127331 128% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2777777778 23.380412469 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3115634454 59.4972553346 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 141.124799967 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 23.380412469 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.674092028746 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 49.9984044096 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.38983050847 1.64882698954 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247168352599 0.391690518653 63% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0860669516196 0.123202303941 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0572607672011 0.077325440228 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.514072954418 0.547984918172 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.114598544386 0.149214159877 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957173950376 0.161403998019 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543613102583 0.0892212321368 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.263591829917 0.385218514788 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0704114578407 0.0692045440612 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161453001809 0.275328986314 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445278889788 0.0653680567796 68% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.