In the last two centuries, technology has seen tremendous growth. From horse driven carriages to modern airplanes and bullet trains, we surely have come a long way. We have always been skeptical of it, always rationalizing about whether the impact is a positive or a negative.
As more and more inventions immure us, it is quite natural to question whether its making us lazy or not. But, we should never forget that when technology solves a problem and changes our way of living, it shows to us the other aspects of life that we were not seeing, and hence giving humans a new set of problems and a chance of showcasing their creativity. It may look as if we are getting controlled by our own invention, with people choosing their Iphones over real companionship but that Iphone has improved our life. We can check emails, do phone calls and click a photo just with a single device that can fit in our palms. Did people stop thinking after getting all these facilities. No!! They improved it and took it to next level with introducing so many apps like Uber, zomato that has made life of a stranded tourist easier.
Also we should accept the fact that all human beings are not created equal. We may see some people rejecting the real social life conversations for online gaming, but we totally neglect the people who have severe case of social anxiety, and that inventing a different mode of communication has introduced some firends in their lives. So, a person who is ill-equiped of soving a problem of communication through the traditional route, has now solved it for himself by standing on the shoulders of technology.
A very narrow view of technology may make us neurotic about its ill effects, but aren't we the ones, who have always used things for our own mean benefits. We started rearing animals for local consumption, now we have made industries out of it. We have invented ways of increasing the milk productivity of cows by unnatural methods. Technology is and always will be the tool, for affecting change, its upto us whether we use it judiciously or not.
- People rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of human to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Write a respond in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client Homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last year that region experienced t 78
- The following appeared as an editorial in the student newspaper of Groveton College To combat the recently reported dramatic rise in cheating among college students colleges and universities should adopt honor codes similar to Groveton s which calls for s 52
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed Reading Course has greatly improved productivity One g 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e life of a stranded tourist easier. Also we should accept the fact that all huma...
^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
... us neurotic about its ill effects, but arent we the ones, who have always used thing...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73829201102 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65680164209 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600550964187 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8399934626 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1875 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10956498179 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383383531076 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.02521164523 0.0758088955206 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649983431807 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304089126481 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.