As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Society is becoming increasingly technologically driven with the widespread use of personal devices, voice recognition software, and artificial intelligence. Revolutionary innovations are transforming the way we interact with one another, and even ourselves.
While the “digital age” has made many aspects of daily life more efficient, some fear that an increasing dependence on sophisticated technologies to solve problems will be detrimental to human’s cognitive abilities. Although these fears seem reasonable, reliance on technology will not inhibit our intellectual progress. It is evident that not only will humans require substantial intellectual capabilities to operate and understand technological systems, but further invention will require problem solving ingenuity.
Operating complex, sophisticated technologies requires immense cognitive talent. As our devices and systems become more and more complex, the human ability needed to use and monitor these machines will only increase. Not only do the most technologically sophisticated jobs require extensive education and specialized training, but also the abilities needed to understand and augment complex technological processes abounds. Computer scientists, for example, devote many working hours solving complex problems, such as fixing bugs in their code, just as data scientists continue to monitor their predictive algorithms for several months after initial development to ensure that their projects are on course. As the capabilities of digital resources increases boundlessly, the necessary talent to ensure effectiveness of these resources is growing commensurately.
Additionally, further invention spurred by contemporary ideas will necessitate problem solving ingenuity. Technology drives innovation in that it facilitates the exchange of ideas. Progress and innovation become possible when ideas are accessible, or, as the famous saying states, when one is “standing on the shoulders of giants.” The simplest technologies have seeded decades long advances in fields such as computer science. The original mac computer for example, instigated generations of innovators competing for sleeker, more sophisticated personal devices. As we increasingly rely on the ability to exchange information swiftly and effortlessly, seemingly impossible innovations, like the iPhone, are coming to fruition. The ability to readily access information facilitates innovation, and necessitates the ability to think critically and creatively solve problems.
While some might argue that easily accessed information and self-relying technology has made humankind lackadaisical, history tells us that technological capabilities will not be detrimental to our capabilities. The sophistication of calculators has not left us with worse math skills, nor decreased demand for mathematicians. Not only have the technical curriculums taught in schools expanded, but also the necessity for highly developed problem-solvers has exploded with changes in innovation. It is clear that while advances are making the most unfavorable tasks of daily life more efficient, advanced intellectual skills are more imperative than ever.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Mridul | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | chrissyready | 66 | view |
- “A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the pos 16
- The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you either agree or disagree with t 70
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 55
- Pursuing a financially stable career tends to inhibit creativity and innovation Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and suppo 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anding on the shoulders of giants.' The simplest technologies have seeded de...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2771.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.31207289294 5.05705443957 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42895655537 2.79657885939 123% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574031890661 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 898.2 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.59117977528 126% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.875643173 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.55 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.95 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231908311979 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679020175279 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400921904049 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124797751835 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376982511488 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 14.1392134831 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.32 48.8420337079 33% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.32 12.1639044944 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.38706741573 127% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 100.480337079 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.