As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technology has taken over our lives in the past few years. From calculating numbers to cultivating crops, advancement in technology is so quick that, before we get to understand a product, a new and a better one is released into the market. It is safe to say that technology indefinitely made our lives comfortable, but it also induced a sense of incompetence and lethargy into our lives. All these inventions were made by us, humans, which a result of sheer intellect and brainstorming and new products are out everyday, yielding better results that is predecessor. This proves that technological advancements do not deteriorate human ability to think, but in fact yield better results.
Automobiles were invented nearly 200 years ago. Nowadays nearly every household in most of the countries own a car and it has become an essential part of one's life to travel comfortably without depending on others. The first car barely crossed a street, with a speed less that 5 mph. In 2019, the fastest road legal car, travels at a speed of 279 mph. If the invention of a car led to the deterioration of the brain, we would have never got this far. Due to the rise of competition in the market and increase in external sources this feat could be achieved. Surely one's health is affected due to lack of movement and increased levels of inertia, but one has to be responsible in controlling their health.
Take cell phone an example. Calls were first made nearly 100 years ago by Alexander Graham Bell and he used a table phone which drastically varies from the one's we use today, known as a smartphone. Technology has evolved so rapidly over the past century in such a way that we went from making calls to making a video call over the mobile and see a person anywhere around the globe. A video call is a mere perk using a mobile today which is one of the many quirks and features in a smartphone. If not for the reluctance to improve that quality and comfort in making a call, we would not have the luxury to use such technology today.
Medical advancements over the years has been one of the biggest achievements for humans. From penicillin to curing cancer, technological advancements have surely improved our lives. The different machinery used nowadays is so far advanced compared to the past decade, cancer which was compared to nothing but death, is now curable. Recent achievement in organ transplantation has proved to be a vital step in medical field.
It is acceptable that technology has made us lazy and incompetent, but it is completely our choice to decide how we carry out our life and to make the best out of it. It is evident from the above examples that technology advancement hasn't stopped us from going further but in fact made sure we improve the existing products. Human life span has deteriorated over the past few years and lack of physical exercise is one of the factor. Blaming technology for deteriorating physical movement is completely absurd and unfair as we should make sure we stay fit and compensate some amount of the time in our day to physical activities. Technology has indefinitely effected human's brain to think but the positives do not out-weigh the negatives and hence the statement that technological advancement led to the deterioration of human's brain to think is absurd.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
2020-01-05 | Mridul | 66 | view |
2019-12-31 | chrissyready | 66 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 50
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- Science is meaningless without religion.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should conside 58
- "Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition."Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your rea 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 513, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... brainstorming and new products are out everyday, yielding better results that is predec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... and it has become an essential part of ones life to travel comfortably without depe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ces this feat could be achieved. Surely ones health is affected due to lack of movem...
^^^^
Line 9, column 123, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...etely our choice to decide how we carry out our life and to make the best out of it...
^^^
Line 9, column 234, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...ve examples that technology advancement hasnt stopped us from going further but in fa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, as to, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2747.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 572.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80244755245 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89045207381 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85117671164 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 892.8 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4994023035 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.653846154 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.80769230769 5.21951772744 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110560092431 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320847862013 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343559655109 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612220866852 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321732472187 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.