The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Human brain is a very unique organ when compared to other animal species. It is our mind which differentiates from other living species. Human mind is capable of doing many things one cannot imagine. An average person uses only 20 percent of the brain and by using only one fifth of the brain it lead to so many wonders. Machines are objects created by the humans to make life easier, but can never be superior to humans.
Firstly, machines cannot correct themselves where as humans can. There is always room for error no matter how hard you try. In such a case a machine cannot correct itself and needs human intervention to proceed. It is arguable that humans make more mistakes than a machine does. That is what makes us human and in the same way we correct ourself's from time to time. Such unique capabilities puts humans quite far ahead of the machines.
Furthermore, a machine can always be manipulated or hacked which may lead to a catastrophe. Humans always try to find mistakes in others work or try to implant them in order to be recognized. During such circumstances the data or information stored in a machine can always be hacked and the result can be manipulated. This leads to a security breach and destroys the laborious efforts the person had put in order to achieve the desired result. But a human mind cannot be hacked and it is always up to us to give up the information with held by us. Thus we can conclude that we can never trust a machine with classified and delicate information.
Finally, machines are bound to only the specific set of instructions given to them and cannot perform beyond that. Each machine has a unique purpose and each machine has a unique set of instructions implanted into their mainframe. So we can say that machine can never improve but in case of humans there is always room for improvement.
It is not a bad idea to have machine in our life's. They make our lives easier and have always made our life easier. But this excess usage of machines is effecting the humans both physically as well as intellectually. Since the positives don't outweigh the negatives we can conclude that the human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimul 29
- Science is meaningless without religion.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should conside 58
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 66
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
Human brain is a very unique organ when compared to other animal spe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Human brain is a very unique organ when compared to other anim...
^^
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...by using only one fifth of the brain it lead to so many wonders. Machines are object...
^^^^
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...tly, machines cannot correct themselves where as humans can. There is always room for er...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'put'.
Suggestion: put
... time to time. Such unique capabilities puts humans quite far ahead of the machines....
^^^^
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ive up the information with held by us. Thus we can conclude that we can never trust...
^^^^
Line 9, column 30, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'machined'.
Suggestion: machined
...vement. It is not a bad idea to have machine in our lifes. They make our lives easie...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 191, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...is effecting the humans both physically as well as intellectually. Since the positives don...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... as intellectually. Since the positives dont outweigh the negatives we can conclude...
^^^^
Line 9, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ually. Since the positives dont outweigh the negatives we can conclude that the h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, well, as well as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66161616162 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57888500966 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4518517894 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.9166666667 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95833333333 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339046825287 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987829205833 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719961708881 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192329965013 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466249636293 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.