As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position

Essay topics:

As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Using technology is increasing more than ever and it could provide more convenient situation for all of us. Although it provides easy condition for us like telecommunication and facilitating transportation, the deterioration effects on mental abilities has always been a disputeable issue. some believes this trend would destroy problem solving skill of human race.

Technology provides a wide range of facilities for human kind which enable to expedite different jobes and decrese mindane activities. For example, engineers are not struggling with terminable calculation or tideous drawing process, these activities has been done by computeres and free time for them to think for other important problems. Also, people use softwares in everday activities such as finding routes or calculating price of buy list and they can free their mind to broaden teir relation with their families. Some may believe these activities which were applied by human could help to improve mind's ability whereas people are struggling with most difficult problems than before ranging from finding a substitute for fossil fuel to diminishing greenhouse gases.

Social media provides a great foundation for sharing differnt ideas around the globe. People can be familiar with different ideas and broaden their horizens which was impossible last decades. For example, one may ask about a problem from any where and some could introduce some solutions that they had used. On the other hand, critices may denote that people do not try to solve the problem, they just google about their problem and use other people solutions. Although, it may detriorate for some people which overuse these abilities of thecnologies, some who are interested in solving problems try to find new one and solve it through the Internet.

Modern life provide different facilities for humankind and each person can use it differently. As some may use it to ask others for solution, the others could use it to free their time to think more critical issues or have more time with their familis.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-24 ali.rs 66 view
2019-12-24 ali.rs 66 view
2019-12-23 ali.rs 58 view
2019-12-23 ali.rs 58 view
2019-12-23 ali.rs 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ali.rs :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...es has always been a disputeable issue. some believes this trend would destroy probl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
... relation with their families. Some may believe these activities which were applied by ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...ample, one may ask about a problem from any where and some could introduce some solutions...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, whereas, for example, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30061349693 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74661692823 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573619631902 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6154600659 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.428571429 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253825850383 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956372797566 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493956321438 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165852797804 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258675109209 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.