As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The development of technology has took off with unprecedented pace in the 21 century. Especially the development of smartphones is something that most of us can cherish and it is hard to argue that humans are now heavily relying on technology. Nowadays we are heavily relying on smartphones to solve menial tasks which may hinder our problem solving skills but, complicated tasks such as math, science or artistic abilities have not lessened with the development of technology.
It is hard to argue against the fact that smartphones have become an essential part of our daily lives. It helps us to schedule our plans, it helps us to save contact information and it also helps us when we get lost in a complicated city. These numerous functions that help us in our daily lives are actually hindering our abilities to think for ourselves. For instance, in the past when we did not have access to navigation through our phones we would have to think North, East, West and South and find the right way, or we would have to try to figure out where we could get sufficient information. On the contrary with our phones we would just simply open up google maps and find our way to the destination which requires much less cognition. Also, in the past people would try to memorize phone numbers of intimate people because phones could not save any contact information. That kind of training may have helped with people's memory. Therefore, for problems that we encounter in our everyday lives, we have deteriorated the ability to solve them.
Nevertheless, humans have not lost the ability to think in subjects that are abstract and complicated. Subjects requiring critical thinking such as math or science, or other disciplines requiring imagination like arts and music have not gone downhill. Researchers nowadays are thriving to push the limits of human knowledge and it is hard to say that they are less qualified than the researchers of the past. Rather technology such as, particle accelerators or electron microscopes, are helping them to find new knowledge. Same for arts and music, people are still testing their limits of imagination to create new pictures, sculptures and symphonies and are getting the help of technology.
In conclusion, even if we have lost some cognitive skills in our everyday tasks, we still possess the power to think critically or creatively in sophisticated tasks and technology even has helped to do so.
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 62
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers.Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agr 83
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 66
- 132. Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write 66
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
The development of technology has took off with unprecedented pace in the 21 c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ified than the researchers of the past. Rather technology such as, particle accelerato...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, as to, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98774509804 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81932216503 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502450980392 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0443854761 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.705882353 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115630765602 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454903894257 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030542987291 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0753907837091 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328570960225 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.