As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technology is advancing and this a fact that everyone is aware of. But, the enigmatic part is the fact that the general public's reliance on technology is also burgeoning. The ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate if this reliance is not put under a check. The reliance is clearly visible in the form of the number of gadgets and their usage. The essay will dissect the given issue's prevalence for the different sections of the society.
The ability of humans to think for themselves is the power which differentiates them from others. So, if it is diminishing then it is a matter of concern. For the laypeople technology is nothing but a convenience. Anything that reduces time and effort is technology. But, as Bertrand Russel said " Technology should be combined with wisdom to get productive results", our view of technology should be of a tool and not of a helper.
The habit of going to the libraries , putting effort in research and understanding the concepts thoroughly has become obsolete. Yes, it was time consuming but it is this process that improved our thinking ability. Today it is very easy for anyone who has access to internet to get the answers. For instance, the use of calculators has intensified so much that the students tumble at doing simple calculations when asked to do it without the use of calculators. Quality writing and grammar have started to become a thing of rarity. When a person looks for a connotation of the word in the dictionary it is often that he learns a few more words than intended but that is not the case when we use applications like "GrammarCheck".
However, dependence on technology is not a complete bane. For analysts, scientists and people who are into research and work for the upliftment of the society, technology has proved to be friend. Their motto is not to get calculations done quickly or to solve complex situations, but to improve the world in which we live. Human interference has harmed the environment and climate change is real. Recently a study found out that the decade gone was the hottest decade on record. Bushfires, floods, extreme cold all are adding to it. In such circumstances it is the ability of humans and technology that will help save lives and revert back to normal. Be it Electric vehicles, renewable energy sources or digitization, all of them are a step in right direction, because we want our measures to be progressive rather than regressive.
As it is famously said, " Give a man a fish, you feed him once. Teach a man to fish, you feed him for life." This should be the essence of our reliance on technology. My partial agreement with the issue is because technology being a support is detrimental for human ability to think , but technology's multifaceted impact cannot be overlooked
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...matic part is the fact that the general publics reliance on technology is also burgeoni...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the number of gadgets and their usage. The essay will dissect the given issues pre...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the different sections of the society. The ability of humans to think for themselv...
^^^
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... which differentiates them from others. So, if it is diminishing then it is a matter o...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er. The habit of going to the libraries , putting effort in research and understa...
^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s detrimental for human ability to think , but technologys multifaceted impact can...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2351.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 483.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86749482402 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02366476708 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.492521786 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0740740741 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.92592592593 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231229199453 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546504701721 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611748204423 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122944479713 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332858906925 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.