As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Technology is replacing human in solving problems which is apparently reducing human's ability to think for themselves. However, technology is not just making human brain useless rather increasing its effectiveness in various ways. The assertion about technology replacing human's thinking power is nonetheless improper.
The new era where technology has become ubiquitous is the indication of advancement and prosperity not only by making problem solving easy but also by ensuring a comfortable and relaxing life for human. Relying on technology is the most effective way to operate in this modernized era. Despite having few demerits, it has mostly strengthened the new generation.
For example, human is using its brain for programing, coding and other tech related skills to make technology more capable, Huge tech industry is being recognized where millions of human are working hence using there thinking ability while operating the machines. For instance, Silicon Valley of Los Angeles, California is the growing industry where tech is making man power more effective. Almost every developed country is establishing tech industry as a medium of power. Advanced educational system has made technical knowledge mandatory. Vocational training on tech is widespread in almost every nation,
Human brain is now thinking faster and smarter with the help of technology where a ton of their problems being taken care of. Hence, human has become more efficient than before as they have more time to be involved in other stuffs which are not being taken care of by the technology. As a result, human thinking has become more rigid and time saving in use and varieties in thinking is making them more eclectic.
In a nut shell, it could be possible that too much reliance on technology would have an adverse effect on human's thinking capability. Yet it is a blessing to use technology in a way where human are being highly benefited with maintaining significant utilization. Human's thinking power would rather increase if technology is properly utilized.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thinking power is nonetheless improper. The new era where technology has become ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, then, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 324.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36111111111 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82816272871 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549382716049 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5261839467 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5625 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354465671732 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120938982314 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899708692927 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200790933038 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586930473225 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.