As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technology has changed the way think about our world, but not our ability to think within the world. Today, many young people use computers to program advanced computer languages to solve advanced mathematical and technical problems. Additionally, a variety of research tools are now online, enabling people to find the answers to their own questions with ease. Both have expanded our ability to think about the world in new and advanced ways. While some basic skills have degraded, more advanced levels of thinking have taken its place.
As new technology has come online, so to has the need for people with an understanding of both math and language. The people are computer programmers. They are experts in mathematics and logical language. These are solving problems such as how predict the weather with advanced computer models or how do we make ordering a Christmas gift online easier? These are advanced problems, that take problem solvers that understand how to solve both basic and advanced problems.
Additionally, many people around the world are solving their own problems and thinking for themselves by using many of the online research tools. A few decades ago, disadvantages members of society were at the mercy of highly trained lawyers and secluded libraries to learn about the law. An accused man or women could not independently research their own case. Today, however, anyone can learn about the law, previous case laws, disposition of relevant judges. What has changed in technology, today there are online legal databases, blogs and many courts publish their documents for public viewing. Those that want and need to think for themselves, can do so.
All of the above are examples of people solving problems and thinking for themselves. However, one should acknowledge some basic skills have eroded. Many children struggle at spelling. Spellcheck has enabled many children to sidestep the dreaded teacher’s red-pin. These students are not better spellers; their word processor has gotten better at deciphering their words.
In sum technology has improved our ability to solve advanced problems. Problems such as the weather that rely on math and logical language problem solving. Additionally, the advent of online legal repositories and blogs have empowered people to think for themselves about the law. All that being said, we must acknowledge that some basic skills have degraded as technology has improved. In sum, people are able to solve more advanced problems and think for themselves.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasonin 50
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 2, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...d to think for themselves, can do so. All of the above are examples of people solving pr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30174563591 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64737619026 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488778054863 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9830992722 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.7692307692 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4230769231 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.38461538462 5.21951772744 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182117741383 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571676328717 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581922822555 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113615686214 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551083302887 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.