As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether the ability of human to think for themselves will surely deteriorate as people rely more and more on technology to solve problems. Indisputably, technology play a vital role in today’s world and helps to simplify complex problems, reducing time and effort and help people focus their energy on better things. Nevertheless, people’s ability to think for themselves would deteriorate as they no longer keep their brains active with engaging task.
First, people’s thinking faculty becomes more productive and active when it’s been engaged. Not only that, more solution and creativity evolve when one solves a problem manually and not depend on technology to get it done.
Furthermore, people are generally lazy the less pressure there is to think for themselves, and the more they seem to depend on technology, the more they deteriorate. Also, Let’s take an example on the use of the internet like google, before this tool came into place, people had various points of getting information and not until now, most people depend solely on the internet to get reliable information.
Undoubtedly, Technology aids better and faster access to information and helps to improve the general quality of the human life but relying more and more on this can reduce the human efficiency. Admittedly, As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 19.6327345309 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 2260.96107784 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 237.0 441.139720559 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27004219409 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.56307096286 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78237970916 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 204.123752495 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565400843882 0.468620217663 121% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 705.55239521 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2927558358 57.8364921388 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.777777778 119.503703932 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 23.324526521 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.70786347227 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.627683665234 0.218282227539 288% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.28785391945 0.0743258471296 387% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.242148786502 0.0701772020484 345% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.380331632873 0.128457276422 296% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177738057226 0.0628817314937 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.3799401198 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.3550499002 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32208582834 110% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 98.500998004 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.