As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Technology is the ultimate friend for human being on earth, if used in a proper way. The prompt states that thinking ability of humans will be surely deteriorating as they keep on relying on the ever-developing technology. I mostly disagree with the statement for 2 reasons.
Firstly, it is the human being who develops the technology. So, obviously to develop the technology in the first-place people behind it had to do the thinking. Furthermore, to keep on developing the technology people working behind has to do all the programing for the technology to work in a certain way. For example, as calculators make everyday calculations easier, it might seem that calculator has a brain of itself to perform the calculations. Even if I recognize the internal programing of it as it's brain, that was done by the people who developed it. And, even for the common people other than the developers of the calculators, have to do the main part, thinking to use the calculator. Its machine might ease the job of summation, subtraction and all other calculations but it’s the user who has to decide what to calculate.
Secondly, technology has given humans to focus more on the important part/crucial part of thinking. Even in the case of simple calculator, one might argue, deciding what to calculate is far more important than how to calculate. This is far strongly illustrated if we consider any intricate job like technical designing. For example, while design software like AutoCAD, takes care of the 'how to draw' part, designers have much more time to decide on what to draw and critically decide on the technical aspects of the design.
However, technology might have enhanced the thinking capability of some people, but other vast majority of them who don't have to do the any sort of technical thinking, might lose their efficiency over even simple calculations, one might say, as they say, 'use it or lose it'. But there we have to rethink the very definition of thinking. "how to add, subtract" - is it as important thinking as deciding more challenging decisions of life? When we have technology to take care of the everyday mundane job- we have the time to focus more on life which loves to throw challenges one after another. So, letting the technology do its job is not necessarily taking away our ability to think in any way.
Technology is ever helping hand we could use to make our lives a bit easier. Using it, doesn't mean we're losing the thinking capability. Even if loose the capability to add we'll have more time to focus our thinking on more important issues of life. and, mundane things like being able to calculate might not actually regarded as thinking capability someday.
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 71
- governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear 62
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 58
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood Moreover the majority of fami 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...riend for human being on earth, if used in a proper way. The prompt states that thinking abilit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that calculator has a brain of itself to perform the calculations. Even if I reco...
^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...gn software like AutoCAD, takes care of the how to draw part, designers have much more ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...le, but other vast majority of them who dont have to do the any sort of technical th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... make our lives a bit easier. Using it, doesnt mean were losing the thinking capabilit...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...an were losing the thinking capability. Even if loose the capability to add well have m...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...nking on more important issues of life. and, mundane things like being able to calc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2247.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8954248366 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86294608794 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474945533769 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8016703052 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6956521739 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9565217391 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266607257333 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788888103425 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647742947136 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162007170354 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639376595159 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.