As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The advent of technology has undoubtedly revolutionized our lifestyle. After the landmark era of the late 17th century, people have become persuaded that their conventional lives are not the perfect ones. Also, owing to human’s tendency to improve their lives, they come up with an era that is called the industrial revolution. We have seen numerous inventions in every aspect of our daily lives. Take the railroad and the trains into account. Certainly, this has had a positive impact on the countries economy. We used those inventions to sell our product to remote destinations. The prompt, on the other hand, tries to convey the idea that technology has adversely impacted individuals and deteriorated our health in many aspects. While this argument seems to persuade others into possessing a second thought about the technology, I believe that the advantages of the technology we utilize outweigh the liabilities associated with each technology, and we should take advantage of their pros and avoid the disadvantages. I feel this way because of three reasons that I will profoundly explain in the following paragraphs.
For one thing, I do believe that technology, since its emergence, has helped human beings to improve their lifestyles. As it is pinned in our inherent souls, we try to come up with ideas that provide us an easy life. For instance, in the 15th century, we used horses and other wildlife animals as means of transportation. They were used if an army wanted to be moved from ancient Rome to civilized Greece. Since it took a lot of time to move from one place to another, they come up with different inventions to move faster. Three centuries later, they invented the first steam car, which traveled faster than the horse and buggies. Therefore, it is unfair to judge all technologies negatively.
Secondly, a large number of technologies have enhanced our medical equipment. For example, since the late 90th, scientists have invented numerous surgical robots to do surgical operations in places where access to advanced medical treatment is unfortunate. So, this particular technology has aided people in restoring their health. Also, the invention of vaccines evidently helped us to survive some systemic illnesses in the past. For instance, vaccines were used as a lifesaver to treat smallpox and yellow fever in the last century.
On the other hand, I cannot condemn this argumentation that some technologies have distracted us from living normally. Nowadays, we believe that it is impossible to live without social media. Youngsters think that this is the only invention that will help them achieve their true goals. Whilst it may be a logical argument, it has worked negatively in most societies. For example, the number of students who abandon their assignments to be just on social media has increased noticeably. This makes sense because the time we spend on media is more interesting than doing boring homework. That is why I am partly in favor of the idea of some technologies that are not as useful as they seem to be.
In conclusion, we should consider both the positive and negative sides of each technology before making any false judgments. It is imperative to use those technologies that have certain benefits for our lives. In doing so, I believe that technologies have not seriously harmed us.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby 60
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 484, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...y this has had a positive impact on the countries economy We used those inventions to sel...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e all technologies negatively Secondly a large number of technologies have enhanced our medical ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, for one thing, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 33.0505617978 218% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2731.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 548.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98357664234 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75064533088 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510948905109 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 900.0 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 548.0 23.0359550562 2379% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2731.0 118.986275619 2295% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 548.0 23.4991977007 2332% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 144.0 5.21951772744 2759% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1412126402 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1412126402 0.0831039109588 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831334232362 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129494971555 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 276.0 14.1392134831 1952% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -484.74 48.8420337079 -992% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 217.0 12.1743820225 1782% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.08 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 34.62 8.38706741573 413% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 11.8971910112 496% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 221.2 11.2143820225 1972% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 59.0 11.7820224719 501% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.