As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In

Essay topics:

As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Technology has really improved humans efficiency, as technology is the system to solve several problems in a fast way. Replacing the humans ability to think with technology is not compatible as this have their different and distint roles to play in solving problems.

The task of solving numerous mathematical issues would have been more time consumming if not with the help of technology in using calculator. The works of technology equipments does not erase the fact that human still needs their thinking ability to make technology more efficient. As a matter of fact, the calculator was built up by some genius who used their thinking ability. Therefore, the use of calculator is just for saving time and energy, it has nothing to do with abiliy of humans to think. Humans build all the technology equipment with their ability to think.

In the medical field, in genetics, sequencing an organism gene will most likely take a numerous days/years. But the invention of genetical equipments has helped to shorten the length of days/years. The sequencing helps scientists to understand the nature of some diseases, they can use the knowledge to manipulate the gene of organism. This suggest the facts that as technology improves, human thinking ability also improves and one does not overide the other.

My science teacher once told me and I paraphrase, “humans reasons ability would have not been efficient if not for the intervention of technology”. People can work together to achieve the same purpose with the use of technology. A group of people accross the globe once work on a survey to know the effect of not having a guidiance or parent(s) among the teenagers. There scope of research would have been limited if not for the use of technology, which helped to gather different sample’s (person’s) opinion. And this gave their conclusion a strong claim. Remember, setting the technology equipment to perform this task, collating the response and analysing the responses before conclusion, requires humans thinking ability.
Conclusively, technology does not limit human thinking ability, it rather makes it to be more efficient, an individual that is unable to think will not be able to use technology efficiently.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-01 jahot 66 view
2024-02-01 jahot 66 view
2023-10-26 topeibisanmi@gmail.com 66 view
2023-10-05 sunnyojh 66 view
2023-09-04 ninini 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user DCAD123 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a fast way" with adverb for "fast"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...is the system to solve several problems in a fast way. Replacing the humans ability to think ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...l problems in a fast way. Replacing the humans ability to think with technology is not...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'day'?
Suggestion: day
...m gene will most likely take a numerous days/years. But the invention of genetical e...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, still, therefore, as a matter of fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 361.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19667590028 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85504874219 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529085872576 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9652826051 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.222222222 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257992937133 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853855127926 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592152110314 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152530551367 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497061096646 0.0667264976115 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.