Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits Write a response in which you discu

Essay topics:

Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position you should consider the possible consec ices of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position

Employees deserve the freedom to have their privacy, Company's management monitoring of all employee e-mail is not showing that the company trust their workers and this could result in adverse effect beyond the proposed benefits.

Firstly, monitoring the employee's email will in no way improve the employees efficieciency, they will rather be working under pressure, and will want to be extra careful not to be a victim to the comapany's mangement. The employees email should be for their own personal use, to be able to use their personal skills effectively. For instance some workers will choose to sit with their email to create some adverts to popularize themselves which will in turn help them to advertise the company. Employees should be given the liberty to work without thorough manitaring for better effectiveness.

There was a lawfirm in Osogbo, Nigeria where they offer proper services, the secretary always do her possible best to ensure the proper running of the company but along the line she was fired, and it was later revealed that the owner of the company got to see her conversation with one of the clients, where the client was trying to offer her a bribe the H boss was not patient enough to ruminate on the information, but unfortunately fired the secretary. Wheareas the Secretary was only trying to have a friendly conversation without insulting the man and so that they do not loose their customer, but the Owner of the firm could not see the secretary intention Allowing the employee to work on their own without monitoring their privacy will help for smooth running of the company

While some may oppose these point of views, following the employees closely will only make the company to run less efficiently as everyone will want to satisfy the company's management, neglecting their own strategies. This will eventually leave the company to run only based on the strategy of the management. This is not so bad, but their ois need for differnt skills for better results.

Having, see the needs to allow the employee work without close monitoring, the management should work better by employing trust worthy workers and leave them to perform their work without close monitoring and support their works in other ways for more efficiency.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-30 DCAD123 50 view
2023-04-09 Aaishani De 58 view
2022-10-16 Chaitanya02 50 view
2022-10-06 asm01 83 view
2022-06-27 Nalu00 75 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user DCAD123 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...sulting the man and so that they do not loose their customer, but the Owner of the fi...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, while, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03713527851 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63316813532 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488063660477 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 23.0359550562 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 151.823878227 60.3974514979 251% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 189.9 118.986275619 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.7 23.4991977007 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168243812735 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076343191894 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544917742985 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110627182193 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495344216853 0.0667264976115 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 14.1392134831 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 11.2143820225 150% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.