Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Privacy, one of the fundamental rights of man, has been the topic of discussions recently. And rightly so. While we have governments and business conglomerates seeing every opportunity to mine data from the common man, it behooves us to stand up to these human rights infringements and demand more accountability. Let us talk about the policy of monitoring that has been proposed above, and what the potential fallout of implementing this could be, especially in the current atmosphere.
Monitoring the email activity of employees is a flagrant act of privacy invasion by the company. Employees would not be comfortable having their mails, chats and call histories being watched by company superiors. Introducing such policies would create conflicts between disgruntled employees and superiors, who may threaten to leave the company. New employees would think twice before committing 2-3 years of their servitude to an organization that openly spies on its employees' activities, in the name of increasing efficacy and security.
Introducing this policy may also not be effective in the direction that has been propounded. In fact, it could turn out to be counter-productive. The claim is that such monitoring would reduce the waste of time and system capacity. Both constitute tenuous reasons, without any data that would convey a lack of efficiency in time or space. Even if they were to curtail these freedoms, the recalcitrant employees would find other ways of correspondence, such as Microsoft Teams. If there is evidence citing a lack of efficacy among the employees, alternate ways that are more effective and less invasive have to be thought of. This could be something like a periodic performance review, incentives such as bonuses and extra days of leave for work done ahead of schedule, or in the extreme case, an induction of new employees followed by laying off the slovenly ones.
The policy would ruin employee satisfaction as well, turning them against the superior and HR managers. Some may consider redressing the issue of infringement of employees' rights to worker unions, or worse to media outlets. The companies name and reputation would be vilified and tarnished. Instead of protecting the company from external lawsuits, they would have to fight lawsuits from their own employees!
In conclusion, no amount of time and resource wastage can be cited as a valid reason to snoop on one's own employees. Introducing this policy would create far more severe problems than there already are.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 75 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | Aaishani De | 58 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Chaitanya02 | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | asm01 | 83 | view |
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits Write a response in which you discu 83
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child Of all the dance schools in Elmtown Pirouettes has the most intensive program and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world Many of our students have gon 78
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school Last year Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor Swift Nutrition This company serves low fat low calorie meals th 66
- Mass media and the internet have caused people s attention spans to get shorter However the overall effect has been positive while people are less able to focus on one thing they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quan 58
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a lack of efficacy among the employees, alternate ways that are more effective a...
^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
... unions, or worse to media outlets. The companies name and reputation would be vilified a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2118.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26865671642 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97290637634 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589552238806 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3613527945 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.9 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172096357509 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530608570972 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684787115879 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904744483804 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482668481394 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a lack of efficacy among the employees, alternate ways that are more effective a...
^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
... unions, or worse to media outlets. The companies name and reputation would be vilified a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2118.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26865671642 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97290637634 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589552238806 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3613527945 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.9 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172096357509 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530608570972 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684787115879 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904744483804 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482668481394 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.