People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Throughout our lives, we make number of decisions and take actions based on those decisions. Generally, these actions can have either positive or negative effects, on us and/or our surroundings. The given recommendation suggests us to be cautious about those negative consequences we may face, but may not take the benefits into account. I mostly disagree with the given recommendation due to following reasons.
Just as Newton’s third law dictates, every force has an equal and opposite reaction. We can apply the same rule to risk taking and its actions. While being wary of actions may keep you at a safer side, it also means there is little to gain. On the other hand, if your action has a significant amount of risk associated with it, the reward is of the same magnitude. Take for example, the sport of rope balancing. People make world records by balancing on a thin rope tied across two mountains and it wouldn’t be possible if they don’t take the risk of facing death.
Some opportunities can be so evanescent that we have to take action before its late to grab it. At such situations, we may waste some time in thinking about the consequences and ironically, risk to miss the opportunity.
However, some situations should require thorough understanding
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-07 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | ice123 | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | YACHI PATEL | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Sujan Adhikari | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | Tee_Jay | 33 | view |
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 33
- Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby is to widen the highway adding an additional lane of traffic But last 60
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore a chain of movie rental stores quot Because of declining profits we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore 039 s ten movie rental stores Raising prices is not a good opti 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns should require thorough understanding
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, third, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 2235.4752809 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 214.0 442.535393258 48% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98598130841 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.55969084622 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87633429526 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.663551401869 0.4932671777 135% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 704.065955056 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5534673495 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.0769230769 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4615384615 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189921001934 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631927882004 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316160474646 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962524131333 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429654579937 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.