Humans are the slaves of their mind and they follow what they believe. The prompt recommends that the followers of an idea or policy or also the critics of it. In my opinion, I disagree with the statement and argue that it is opposition peoples who become the most critical and about an idea or policy.
In the beginning, most of the times humans are emotional than rational. For this reason, it is not hard to influence a group of people. So it is complex for a group of people to make the right decision most of the time. When people commit to an idea or policy they did that because they believe. And when people believe something they do not raise questions about it also do not like others questioning or judging about it, though others can be right or logical about their questioning. For example- Hitler give birth to World War 2 by making German people believed that a Jews free world will be a better world and no one that time raised questions about that belief. But after the world war-2 German peoples realized what a huge mistake they had made. This above example shows that followers of an idea can blindly follow an idea until the final realization about what a huge mistake they made.
Secondly, when people do not believe or follow an idea it is easier for them to make questions and being critical about that idea. It is easier for them to question the followers of that idea. They also realize the wrongdoing of the followers of that idea. For example- Afganistan government system was created by radical Islamist militants and they kept the people of their country in dark from the free world and make them believe in violence. Now after was as Government system has changed now people know they were in Dark world at that time. This above example shows that followers of idea follow that blindly and they do not realize their wrongdoing until they are helped by the other people.
However, theirs some cases in which a past strong believer or follower of an idea becomes the most critical one. Because he had seen and experienced the fault of those ideas and he knows why that idea is a faulty one, and the questions which are being asked by the opposition are right or not. Moreover, in some cases, the opposition of an idea or policy does not fully know the advantage or limitation or negative side of an idea or policy so it is not become accurate of them to completely judge an idea.
In conclusion, though in some cases a strong believer turns to become the most critical one, it is mainly the opposition peoples who are the most critical of that idea.
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 35
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 73
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 65
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University: A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for the 42
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most c 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l they are helped by the other people. However, theirs some cases in which a pa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 467.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54817987152 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30661442017 2.79657885939 82% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.394004282655 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.108699831 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2380952381 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35722042542 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13049329109 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113009020128 0.0758088955206 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266609515155 0.150359130593 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962414900688 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.