People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
As children, we are taught to be strong and be kind, however in the real world if one shows their kind side, people often mistake it for a weak side. Emotions are a natural reaction of humans to situations which often make them vulnerable to situations and sometimes even cloud their judgment. I don't completely disagree with the author, decisions based on emotion might have a higher chance of failing than a logical decision. Let's relate to the statement - Two friends are sitting for an exam, where one asks the other friend to help him out so that he passes the exam. Now both of them know that cheating will drive them into expulsion, so making an emotional decision in this situation will very well lead to destroying a good future.
A logical decision is often a result of a balanced mind where the repercussions of the decision are already weighted out before reaching to the decision. Such decisions are not impetuous decisions but have been developed based on experiences and substantiated data.
Had most of the businessmen like Ratan Tata or Bill Gates brought emotions to the table while making decisions for their empire they might not have reached the zenith of success they have now. One great example to show why emotional decisions often make our judgments cloudy can be seen in medicine where surgeons are not allowed to operate on their relatives.
Well, taking an emotional decision and bringing a little emotion while making a decision are two different things. Being kind and making decisions based on what is beneficial for masses then oneself is a great characteristic seen in successful businessmen. Reliance the giant business group is not just an empire build on shrewdness but also supports multiple charities.
A judicious mix of emotions while making logical decisions have a great way to lead to success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 23
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... sometimes even cloud their judgment. I dont completely disagree with the author, de...
^^^^
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...nce of failing than a logical decision. Lets relate to the statement - Two friends a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 310.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95483870968 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64848339316 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583870967742 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.866521279 60.3974514979 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.153846154 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362935062433 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149898454998 0.0831039109588 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104080874176 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240289413633 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593772738675 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.