People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
In the above statement we can interpret that, people who take decisions based on the emotions and later they justify with logic are considered as poor decision makers. One who have an issue with someone they will take hasty decisions without viewing the consequences, as this might be true to some extent. But without taking that decision one cannot avenge the problem.Their might be a strong emotion that pulls them without not viewing the aftermath.
For instance, we consider the URI surgical strike by India on pakistan. In 2016, pakistan attacked a village called URI, and many soldiers were killed in that attack. As india and pakistan relations were not good and also pakistan is always have same ill-will, India took a decision to retaliate on pakistan and whole nation stood with it, because many incidents resulting the same killings in india. India took a decision without viewing the consequences and given a reply to pakistan and they were contended with that.Here, if india didnot take that decision on pressure, pakistan may take granted that india cannot do anything if we attack also. It is may be correct to take decision in emotion rather than experiencing the same.
If any one took decisions based on the emotion it may worsen the situation than it was. If we consider the same above example, if the other country also retaliate against india, it may become the third world war. Many countries will be automatically involve. This may not be good to take decisions based on emotions without viewing consequences.
As emotions are stronger it may be misleading without our intention it may be become worse, One must always be conscious in taking decisions when they are in some emotional disturbance or emotional happiness. Also one must consider all consequences that may result in taking that decision, inorder to ameliorate. In some situations taking a decision in emotion will be good and we cannot simply consider them as poor decision makers it might be situation based and the person who take decisions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 42
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Their
... decision one cannot avenge the problem.Their might be a strong emotion that pulls th...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...re not good and also pakistan is always have same ill-will, India took a decision to...
^^^^
Line 2, column 520, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Here
...istan and they were contended with that.Here, if india didnot take that decision on ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 643, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...t india cannot do anything if we attack also. It is may be correct to take decision ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 733, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tion rather than experiencing the same. If any one took decisions based on the emo...
^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
... rather than experiencing the same. If any one took decisions based on the emotion it ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nal disturbance or emotional happiness. Also one must consider all consequences that...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, third, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99705014749 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63785437146 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454277286136 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5727752883 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.933333333 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.86666666667 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305575869396 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131959751261 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136717488619 0.0758088955206 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222269298954 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097026548546 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.