People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Often emotion conflicts with logic, as emotion fails to take into account the real life difficulties. So, an attempt to justify the decision with logic which is basically made on emotion, is completely a wrong idea.
In our every day life, we frequently need to make decisions and we have two choices here- either emotionally or logically. It depends on the person to choose whether option he prefers but it is not wise to combine these twos. Because emotion and logic are two completely different approaches to think about a situation or problem. Being emotional we only follow our heart but not cerebral which surrounds the topic with love and passion whereas logic helps to foresee the outcome along with possible difficulties related to it. Emotion doesn't focus on the result, whatever good or bad the result is, the decision is taken. When one person tries to justify such emotional decisions with logic, he or she will definitely face some awkward situation as neither the decision can be changed now nor the forthcoming result can be avoided.
For example, let's think about a mediocre job holder who wants to leave his job to become an artist but there is no other source of income to bear family cost afterward. In this point, if he takes the decision to leave the job, driven by emotion, then it is okay. But after leaving the job, if he tries to think logically, he will be in a great dilemma. He can not get back his job nor can focus on the art.
So, a decision made by emotion, should not be justified by logic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 66
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimul 37
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 30
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ble difficulties related to it. Emotion doesnt focus on the result, whatever good or b...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 271.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68265682657 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45256741814 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590405904059 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2980922309 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6153846154 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314485303533 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11289365349 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852788271483 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212871242927 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862491743748 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.