People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
People are emotionally attached to everyone surrounding them, they may be the friends, relatives, or any family members like mother, father, brother, sister or wife, children. If these people are not close to them, they may get irritated. For example, a boy who got away from mother from the first time for the higher educations. Then, he may not be in good mood after reaching there. Also, he may not get comfortable with teaching and he would not able to pay attention to the teachings. His mother also gets worry thinking, is he taking meals on the time or not.
When comes to the decisions made by the father, he may also got worried at first while taking decision whether to admit the only child in the certain institute or not. But, he then might thought logically that it is good for the boy's future to get admitted in that institute. So, this show that, the people who make decisions based on not only emotions along with the logic, might not get wrong.
For the other explanation, let consider example of another boy who decides not to get admitted in the same institute with the first boy, because of fear of getting into the strange world or location. So, he is making excuses not to get away from his mother. And, further justifying that why he did not get admit in the institute by complaining about poor hostel facility or inexperienced teaching staff or poor campus jobs. But, further it may result into that institute is good among in that area. And placement may results in high increase, and the second boy gets unemployed by the end of the last year. This kind of thinking is same as people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Therefore, people prefer to think to logically about anything important decisions along with the emotions or with less emotions so that their decisions may not that bad.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- Claim : The importance of multidisciplinary education is overrated in today's times.Reason : Education should be focused on preparation for a specific career path and thus students should be encouraged to only pursue a single area of study. 50
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 58
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great 41
- The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group:"The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is esse 41
- The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors:"Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term. We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed satellit 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: COMFORTABLE_WITH_VBG[1]
Message: Use simply 'comfortable teaching'.
Suggestion: comfortable teaching
...er reaching there. Also, he may not get comfortable with teaching and he would not able to pay attention ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun emotions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...cisions along with the emotions or with less emotions so that their decisions may no...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'while', 'for example', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.209115281501 0.240241500013 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.131367292225 0.157235817809 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0938337801609 0.0880659088768 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0723860589812 0.0497285424764 146% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0455764075067 0.0444667217837 102% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134048257373 0.12292977631 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0402144772118 0.0406280797675 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.41800861963 2.79330140395 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.029490616622 0.030933414821 95% => OK
Particles: 0.00268096514745 0.0016655270985 161% => OK
Determiners: 0.088471849866 0.0997080785238 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.029490616622 0.0249443105267 118% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0160857908847 0.0148568991511 108% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1900.0 2732.02544248 70% => OK
No of words: 333.0 452.878318584 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70570570571 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.291291291291 0.366273622748 80% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.225225225225 0.280924506359 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.159159159159 0.200843997647 79% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.102102102102 0.132149295362 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41800861963 2.79330140395 87% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 219.290929204 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516516516517 0.48968727796 105% => OK
Word variations: 53.9147120086 55.4138127331 97% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 20.8125 23.380412469 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2999730022 59.4972553346 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 23.380412469 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.674092028746 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 43.3350225225 51.4728631049 84% => OK
Elegance: 1.5376344086 1.64882698954 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218915029726 0.391690518653 56% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.122175420941 0.123202303941 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0720119546076 0.077325440228 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.508430127499 0.547984918172 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.178535646037 0.149214159877 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991785749279 0.161403998019 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184056825282 0.0892212321368 206% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.386316409449 0.385218514788 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.11168368166 0.0692045440612 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153545382939 0.275328986314 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677710863703 0.0653680567796 104% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.