People who make decisions based on emotions and later justify it with reasons are poor decision makers.
In my opinion, everyone have their own ways and reasons for making any decision. People make decisions with their logic in some situations and with emotions in the others. There is no hard and fast rule as to how decisions should be made.
I disagree to the statement that people who make decisions based on emotion and later try to justify it with logic are poor decision makers. If a decision doesn’t result in an expected result, it may be due to the fact that those making the decision didn't put in the required efforts to materialize it. So, I believe that it is all about persistence and perseverance employed towards making the decision worthwhile. When you make a certain decision you have to adhere by it and leave no room for doubt. If you second guess your decision and fail to act on it, that's when it's truly over and you're labelled as a poor decision maker. Logic and emotion have far less to do with the outcome of our decision than our effort expended in upholding them.
Hence, action determines whether we are good or bad decision makers, not logic or emotions.
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household. 83
- "On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the 83
- “As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability for humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.”Discuss the extent to which you agree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 83
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of weather and 83
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 83
Discourse Markers used:
['hence', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'while', 'as to', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225663716814 0.238963963785 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.163716814159 0.154291517835 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0575221238938 0.0886310499679 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0221238938053 0.0506014161523 44% => More adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0973451327434 0.0449626384858 217% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.128318584071 0.123526278965 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0309734513274 0.0379742944744 82% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57647924445 2.82910677849 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0353982300885 0.0316879551592 112% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0014075125626 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0752212389381 0.0950106342287 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00884955752212 0.0245489744465 36% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0176991150442 0.0157978311181 112% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1109.0 2899.98275862 38% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 194.0 478.390804598 41% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71649484536 6.0591788892 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.65681771538 80% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.329896907216 0.369966551584 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.257731958763 0.285172536893 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.185567010309 0.207245337619 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0927835051546 0.136322040163 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57647924445 2.82910677849 91% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 234.298850575 52% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623711340206 0.492565540709 127% => OK
Word variations: 61.3809089935 56.8184620615 108% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 21.1264367816 47% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 19.4 23.7468607788 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2955268369 62.0618507366 50% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.9 143.81877709 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 23.7468607788 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.728815259664 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.87931034483 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.71264367816 0% => OK
Readability: 45.1731958763 52.2641144681 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.359375 1.64547068916 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408478984179 0.39480681544 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124730973482 0.11556216369 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0778742760616 0.0736162880345 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.583287678275 0.531340600358 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155209489207 0.15197228837 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169864026127 0.158818324754 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142327641814 0.0851127212816 167% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.196548220637 0.388921930462 51% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.114787873202 0.0677916285025 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237383762405 0.28015025965 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837348394138 0.0610219844235 137% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.8591954023 9% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30459770115 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.96264367816 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 8.10632183908 12% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.93390804598 51% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.04597701149 98% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 15.0862068966 40% => More topic words wanted.
--------------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 2.5 Out of 6