A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her labor.
A person accused of a crime is innocent and should be treated as such till proven guilty. The prompt suggests, A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her labor. In my opinion, this topic is not as simple as it seems to be and is relative from person to person or case to case. This article explains the complexity of the issue by three examples.
The person who seems to have committed a crime should be punished commensurately and should be deprived of his or her civil rights or right to benefit from his or her labor. This is based on the reason that once a person commits a crime, he or she automatically gives up the right to freedom. Society should not allow any person to not pay for his or her crimes. For instance, A man who rapes a woman without thinking about anything is a criminal and should be punished as such.
On the contrary, the person who commits a crime in self-defense is innocent and should not be subjected to such a harsh punishment because he or she was only trying to protect one-self. For instance, A woman in self-defense harms a person who is trying to rape her. This example shows that not all are who committed some crime are criminals and should be treated as such. It should not be the case that this woman is subjected to the same condition as the man in the previous example. So, it depends on the case and the punishment should be as such.
Similarly, A person who has allegedly committed the crime should not be treated as a criminal and should have all the rights a normal person has. For instance, there is a person "A" who is trying to help another person "B" in grave danger. Things do not always turn out to be the way we expect them to be. So, person "B" may die near the person "A". This does not mean person "A" killed person "B". This example shows that we should first investigate then jump to the conclusion about a person.
In Conclusion, this issue is not as simple as it seems and there is no general answer to this. Before we jump to any conclusion about a person, we should investigate the case fully and then decide whether he or she should be deprived of the rights or not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-28 | himanshukmr234 | 70 | view |
- Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 73
- Among the intriguing mysteries that the dinosaurs have left for us one of the most persistent is what the arms of Tyrannosaurus Rex T rex were used for A recent presentation to the American Geological Society presented evidence to support the idea that th 65
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 66
- The Reading Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of 76
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, similarly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49403341289 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63552791119 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.384248210024 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.542846553 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9523809524 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38095238095 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432821297528 0.243740707755 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15378832652 0.0831039109588 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.207561439841 0.0758088955206 274% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291686026569 0.150359130593 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.185230786283 0.0667264976115 278% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 12.1639044944 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.38706741573 82% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.