The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Music is a phenomenon that has been pervasive in our lives for centuries. During these times, some musicians gain limitless popularity whereas some don't get the as much. Although the popularity of a popular musician can be a factor when making an impartial decision, waiting several generations after the death of the musician never makes sure that the judgement is totally unbiased.
For one, some musician's fame is perenninal. We could wait 50 years and still the fame of those people will never wane. For instance we can think of the musicians the composed our national anthems and songs of independence. Even after their death they are still alive in our heart for the immortal compositions that they created. Michael Jackson has been dead for almost a decade now, yet youths still hear his songs while imitating his famous "moonwalk". If the claim of the statement is true, therefore, even after their death their popularity will continue to interfere with the honest judgement of their true potential, thus rendering the fact that death negates the effect of popularity, invalid.
Secondly, we need to determine exactly what do we mean by an honest judgement. During any point of life, a small survey made on a small number of people or maybe a research done on how youths conceive a musician is never an honest judgement. Thus, these judgements need to be made by those who know the field of music like the back of their hand. These people, the true critics of music will judge any composition, whether the musician is dead or alive, honestly. Fame is, therefore not any part of their assessment and thus weakens the argument's validity by a great scale. Again, as all things, music changes as time passes by. What is famous and popular now might not be the same 5 years from now. If we wait several decades, therefore, a innovative composition could lose its potential and might not even be considered as part of any known or famous genre of music at that period. Some recordings might be lost or be corrupted due to negligence or lack of preservation. Thus, the assessmnet of these recordings several decades after the death might not prove to be fruitful in determining the true and unbiased genius of that musician at all.
All of this, however, does not undermine the fact that popularity does have a visible effect on the assessment of any persona. Any person, in his hey day, could be rated spuriously high by his avid supporters. For instance, people that are fond of the iconoclastic display of dressing that Lady Gaga displays might rate her way above others if a questionaire or suvey concerning her impact were to be performed right now. Many people wouldn't even think twice before giving her a 5 out of 5 stars on a moment's notice. However, 10 years from now, when these people are either tired of her or maybe have changed to a new genre of music might think her just as another wild dancer who doesn't know what she is doing and might lump her with other aspirant novices. Thus the culmination of one's popularity will inevitably give someone his/her highest evaluation which can be oftentimes a clear hyperbole.
In conclusion, What we perceive as popular music today might not be the same as time passes by. Therefore, if the judgement is done by the true enlightened personas who don't get swayed by the effect of popularity, the lifetime of the musician is the best time when his true potential can be impartially and correctly judged.
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 66
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 54
- "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 29
- "Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 49
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 49
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... gain limitless popularity whereas some dont get the as much. Although the popularit...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat the judgement is totally unbiased. For one, some musicians fame is perennin...
^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
... is totally unbiased. For one, some musicians fame is perenninal. We could wait 50 ye...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tes the effect of popularity, invalid. Secondly, we need to determine exactly w...
^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...y point of life, a small survey made on a small number of people or maybe a research done on how ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...f their assessment and thus weakens the arguments validity by a great scale. Again, as al...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: HAY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heyday'?
Suggestion: heyday
...ment of any persona. Any person, in his hey day, could be rated spuriously high by his ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 435, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... to be performed right now. Many people wouldnt even think twice before giving her a 5 ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ice before giving her a 5 out of 5 stars on a moments notice. However, 10 years f...
^^
Line 7, column 683, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ink her just as another wild dancer who doesnt know what she is doing and might lump h...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 761, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...t lump her with other aspirant novices. Thus the culmination of ones popularity will...
^^^^
Line 7, column 785, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...pirant novices. Thus the culmination of ones popularity will inevitably give someone...
^^^^
Line 9, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ne by the true enlightened personas who dont get swayed by the effect of popularity,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
honestly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2901.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 593.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89207419899 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93473315629 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00118229089 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473861720067 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 914.4 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.184133708 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.576923077 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8076923077 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272492851105 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766228495893 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408803870141 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15705326808 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338954255072 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.