This topic raises controversial issue of whether scandals are useful because they focus on real problems in society and they are real critics or not. Indisputably, scandals can demonstrate fallacious and unfair censure instead of presenting real problems we all encounter in the society. Nevertheless, we can not ignore this point that they are useful because most of the times they point to real issues due to their bitter and straight criticism. Thus, I generally disagree with this point that they represent of fallacy and calumny censure in the community and I would argue that how they help us improving with finding and removing substantial flaws in the society.
first of all, they are straight and fearless and it is desirable characteristics for the constructive critic. I would like to point out that no reformer or speaker cannot be so precise about the real problems. To illustrate, let us look at the example of many third world countries with dictatorship governments in history. These governments never let any reformer or any community for presenting problems in policy or the trend of the economy and always encounter them with violence. In this circumstance, Obviously scandals help a lot in changing the atmosphere with their censure. Consequently, it is pretty obvious in history in which how sometimes they started an effective revolution.
Furthermore, they are living between people in society and they observe problems like a banal citizen. Specifically, when they see the problems they are not compromising and want to talk about it even with bitter language. Both common sense and personal experience have told us the odds in which scandals changing the trend of the community in a better way is high. In this regard, we cant ignore them readily and slur them because we call them scandals.
Admittedly, they can exaggerate or give us false signals about problems. This is true especially when it comes to personal profit. In addition, they can show some problems bigger to hide other problems from our sight. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that we can ignore them by slur and calumny in which they are exaggerating or mislead us.
So based on all arguments above, I think its crucial to take scandals seriously and count on them as real critics. In this regard, they come from people and felt the problems with reall people and no reformer or speaker never can describe problems as well as they do.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 61
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 600, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to improve' or 'improve'.
Suggestion: to improve; improve
...and I would argue that how they help us improving with finding and removing substantial f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...ving substantial flaws in the society. first of all, they are straight and fearless ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... better way is high. In this regard, we cant ignore them readily and slur them becau...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, third, thus, well, i think, in addition, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01213592233 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77251513663 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3851240469 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229290607826 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703607562981 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419713213319 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135399956097 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00872235989702 0.0667264976115 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.