Scandals have been occured from ancient times. Scandals are the activities which break the laws and disrupts the system of government. Owing to this, leaders of nation become more cautious about the problem and they try to find solution as fast as possible. So scandals directly lead our focus to the problem and its solution and these problems can not be overlooked as they are responsible for disrupting the peace of whole country sometimes. So, I would definitely agree with above statement that scandals are very helpful because it draws our attention directly on problems and its solution in a very rapid manner that no speaker and reformer can do.
To begin with, Scandals are everywhere irrespective of fields whether it is about construction of buildings and malls politics. Many people do not pay income tax to the government and when income tax department raids to their house, huge amount of money is found and this thing simply leads to scandal. So, government has to think about the solution of this problem. For instance, in 2016, government of India, demonitized the currency of country and told people of country to replace their currency with new currency in 3 months period. And interestingly, in the period of this 3 months many scandals of hiding huge amount of money illegally came out in the eyes of people. So due to scandal, this problem gets attention and any speaker or reformer can not show this problem.
Secondly, many celebrities such as cricketeres, actors, politicians are responsible for scandal. Sometimes, an actor or crickerer becomes very popular among people of its country and sometimes worldwide. But when public get to know about his misdeeds, they are no more like that cricketer or actor. So owing to scandal, citizens of society can see the other side of such celebrities and no speaker or reformer can bring out such facts about celebrities to common people.
On the other hand, sometimes speaker can play an important role to motivate the major citizens of society. There are many motivations shows which motivates and give a new insight about life to public. Good speakers and reformers have the power to make the people of country strong and improve their life-style. For example, Sandeep Maheshwari is the best public speaker in India, who give various ideas and solution to people of society such as how to live a better life and how to live life happy.
In conclusion, by all means, I would say, scandals have that power to get directly public's attention to the real problems of society and to find its solution, while speakers talk about the solutions of hypothetical situation.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 58
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 58
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 43
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 50
- 1. Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, ar 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he solutions of hypothetical situation.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97065462754 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64226401817 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489841986456 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2247602379 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.1 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.15 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189154352322 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605853436891 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505213154397 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107779208383 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665161983804 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.