Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The consequences of scandals are multifarious in society. According to the prompt, rumors/scandals help ruminate over the problem in-depth that cannot be done by any reformer or speaker. It can be argued that whether a scandal is useful or not is an equivocal comment due to the three reasons.
First of all, in some cases, scandals can have a deleterious effect on some people if they are sensitive to criticism. As a result, instead of focusing on problems, they can be demotivated and create further new problems. For instance, a group of researchers has been blamed in a scandal for creating a new virus that killed millions of people worldwide. Although this accusation might be false, due to intense pressure from society, one of the researchers took a drastic step by committing suicide. Thus, it is plausible to say that people with a lack of mental strength are susceptible to adverse effects that are caused by the scandals.
However, scandals provide a point of view of many people; help in getting into the depth of the problem from different perspectives. For example, a political party that is in power might be alleged of a scandal by another political party. The rumors will involve in a discussion by the people, which will give the opinions from both the sides either supporting it or against it. These debates might help in revealing additional information related to the scandal and help further in the investigation of the scandal.
Furthermore, in some instances, scandals at large scale can create chaos and violent outbreaks. For instance, a charge against the ruling political party of a country that they rigged the elections can lead to upheavals in society. The party supporters might trigger this turmoil and might accuse the opposition party workers of spreading such rumors. Thus, when the scandals are on politically delicate issues, there are high chances of chaos, which might disrupt the order of the community.
In conclusion, it can be summed up by saying that the prompt might only be partially correct. Without refuting to the views that scandals can help in understanding the problems at hand in more detail, it cannot be accepted as a general truth. While the prompt may be right in most of the cases, there are exceptions where scandals could create more problems for some people than focussing on the current problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | userxyz110 | 54 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasonin 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 50
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situat 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99493670886 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80037766126 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526582278481 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8551482263 60.3974514979 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.842105263 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7894736842 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161241865467 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520661487355 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276318527711 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971548265465 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280114007023 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.