The prompt claims that Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. The given claim is contentious because different people may have disparate opinions and positions. Some may go for the claim, while others cannot argue with it at all. I disagree with the claim that scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. The three reasons and examples to support my position on the given claim are presented in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, scandals violet moral values; they spread negative ways to raise voices and for the attention to problems. Yes, it is true that the speaker and reformer should focus on the current problems of the public but the way scandals focus the public’s attention on problems is wrong. Thus, scandals are not useful because they focus our attention on problems by forgetting moral values. For instance, Sarita, a social activist, used to raise voices, she focused our attention on problems in very aggressive ways which leads the public to violet moral values; which is definitely wrong for long-term progress in society.
Furthermore, scandals provoke the public not to follow rules and standards in society just for attention to problems. It is true that speakers and reformers should address the problems of the public and definitely scandals might help somehow but in a real scenario it helps to detach the public from the rules and standards of the society which will lead in the wrong direction. Therefore, scandals are not useful. For example, Biplav has a different view about social norms and values so he raised his voice in an impassioned way just for our attention on problems but now its negative impacts are seen in society such as the relationship of public and speaker and reformer is weak.
However, some argue that scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in a way that no speaker or reformer ever could. While we cannot deny that scandals have no significance in society, the way they approach them is a serious issue. It might solve some current problems but in the long term, it harms the development and progress of society. For instance, we considered Punya Gautam to be very useful for us because he focused our attention on problems but later negative consequences really hurt the progression of society. Speakers and reformers do morally, they do not use negative ways just for our attention on the problems. Hence, scandals are not useful only because they focus our attention on the problems.
In summation, the reasons and examples presented support my position on the claim that I disagree with the claim that scandals are useful because they focus our attention on the problems in a way that no speaker or reformer ever could. The essay illustrates the reasons such as moral values, rules, and standards, and the negative impacts which scandals follow. Examples of Sarita, Biplav, and Punya show that way of scandals are not useful.
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 58
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 50
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an impassioned way" with adverb for "impassioned"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...norms and values so he raised his voice in an impassioned way just for our attention on problems but ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2559.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 513.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98830409357 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54129885373 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.358674463938 0.4932671777 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.0 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9686276188 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.318181818 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3181818182 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.13820224719 331% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456265767048 0.243740707755 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182725170724 0.0831039109588 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156065502817 0.0758088955206 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313620157844 0.150359130593 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103175620497 0.0667264976115 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.