Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Some people may argue that there is not such thing as negative attention. In fact, outrageous headlines are frequently seen plastered across television screens, newspapers, and magazines. The scandals marketed by these provocative apothegms function as an innocent source of superficial entertainment and causal discussion. However, scandals are not equipped to solve important problems for two vital reasons.
Firstly, scandals rapidly draw attention to specific topics; however, they do not produce the strategic discussions needed to cultivate meaningful changes. Attention does not equal constructive action. Secondly, problems must be addressed pragmatically and phlegmatically in order to attract an audience that is capable of implementing innovative solutions. Scandals, on the other hand, simply solicit vexation and defensiveness, thus making it very difficult to hold a fair-minded dialogue. Politics are an excellent example of this distinction. Effective politicians are individuals with candor that are capable of exercising respect and diligence. Feckless politicians are those that devote more time and energy to sparking arguments rather than creating helpful resolutions. Thus, scandals should not be seen as a resource for developing long-term answers to serious problems. Furthermore, the medical field represents the epitome of efficient collaboration. Doctors, nurses, and other healthcare providers do not arrange scandals when they are challenged to solve life-threatening problems. Instead, these medical professionals communicate openly and clearly with one another. The ability of healthcare workers to remain calm and composed allows them to save lives and combat disease. Thus, objective discussions must be utilized to solve issues that extend beyond the healthcare industry, not scandals.
In conclusion, scandals are not an effective problem-solving strategy. Firstly, scandals generate attention not action. Thus, the arousal and controversy surrounding scandals do not translate into impactful solutions. Secondly, scandals cause people to automatically become incensed and partial. A prejudice disposition inhibits objective discussions, which are required to cooperate and communicate with others. Overall, scandals should be reserved for the media. Facetious tag-lines manipulated to trigger an emotional reaction from people should not be used to solve staid problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | userxyz110 | 54 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- ISSUE 9 In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the st 66
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 75
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 66
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...o hold a fair-minded dialogue. Politics are an excellent example of this distinctio...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.20298507463 5.05705443957 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18262715629 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629850746269 0.4932671777 128% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9726174075 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5833333333 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9583333333 23.4991977007 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143885734975 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037285314443 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300603352381 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931124458816 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395257732143 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.9 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.09 12.1639044944 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.38706741573 129% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 100.480337079 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.