Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Scandals comprise of accusations, gossips or allegations which although are undesirable and unfortunate, receive wide exposure. Instances of scandals are pervasive in practically every sphere of our lives today. It might be in the form of some political scam disgracing a country’s ideals, or fraud corporate policies looting off investors, or some Hollywood extra-marital affair or it can be present even in the defense systems of a nation. Whatever be the form, scandals invoke interests among all age groups, are a daily part of the gossip in most parts of the world, and receive tremendous broadcast by the plethora of media channels. The question to whether these sensational bits of information are ‘useful’ to the society or to the world at large though, requires a good analysis by critically examining the types of scandals and by comparing the consequences some of them had, on the public consciousness .
Mostly, scandals benefit the public. The media proves to be an asset in this case as they help broadcast and transmit the scandals up to the minutest detail. Just as Socrates said, “ The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance”, through exposure of certain scandals we are at the receiving end of the actual knowledge behind the shroud of purity and goodness otherwise exhibited by the people or organisation responsible for the scandals. They help us be aware and concerned. Many a times, scandals reform the way a system works. The events throughout history are a testimony to the above claim. India has been a land tainted by corruptions, year after year. Scams and scandals are quotidian issues and have penetrated to the grass root levels of administrations in all the spheres. In 2011 India topped the charts for being the country with the most corrupted politicians and bureaucrats. Scandals worth billions and crores of rupees made headlines. 2G scam, The Commonwealth Games scam, Adarsh housing society scam are a few which shook the nation and brought international condemnation to the country. The common Indians, tired and disgusted, broke out in a widespread agitation against the Government in the form of a revolt, called the India Against Corruption Movement, led by Anna Hazare, in 2011. The citizens demanded a corruption free administration through the passage of the Jan Lokpal bill. Concerned by the vehemence of the movement, the government was forced to pass the resolution for the Jan Lokpal Bill. This proves how being aware of the scandals can make the public move a whole country’s administration.
Scandals sometimes can transform people’s minds and make them wary of the systems they live under. When Edward Snowden revealed the NSA’s secret activities of spying down average Americans, the general American public was aghast at their privacy being violated by the most responsible agency in the country. Even with the rejections of these revealations, the people would forever be leery of the agencies they once placed their wholehearted trust on. They would not be comfortable with the fact that the Big Brother is a lot closer than they thought. Also, on a similar note, the Watergate scam unvieled a substantial lot on the character of their Presidents. With such a severe scandal, would the American public ever percieve their leaders with the same eye they perhaps did before? Scandals can have the type of impact on the public eye, which even the most distinguished of the reformers might not. They have the might to shake us up from a halcyon torpor and unmask the truth, making us awared citizens. They help caution us against ills and hence are useful.
Of course, not all scandals are worth knowing. There is a saying that goes, “The public has an insatiable curiosity to know everything, except what is worth knowing.” The media is the best platform that caters to this curiosity and it delivers the much desired controversies surrounding the lives of celebrities and politicians. For instance, the Bill Clinton- Lewinsky story gained huge follow-ups across continents, but it did little to serve the poverty issues in say Bangladesh, or the widespread malnutrition problems in South Africa. Months later, the issue simply subsided and Clinton continued in office. Life went on around the globe, without any of the most pressing problems being solved anywhere. So, not always do the scandals focus our attention on the things that are important for the greater welfare of a society. Sometimes, they only reveal things which might be shocking, but are insignificant. However, we can always draw positive connections through the fact that these issues are likely to spice up the average lives of the people and attract even the most ignorant of the citizens to follow the news. While they are on it, they are likely to be exposed to other news around the world and if that happens, they would benefit.
Finally, in this era of rapid and exorbitant information dissemination, the public is constantly aquainted of the scandals around the world. While most of the scandals would impact the public consciousness and move them to take up steps against whatever they feel is not correct, a few other scandals would only act as a source of entertainment. So the takeaway here is, we the public would have to distill the ones that reveal the egregious problems that concern us. Although a little entertainment is fine, public would need to absorb the ones worth worrying for. The ones of such kind are vital for the public as they help bolster the resolve to fight against and redress the injustices inflicted upon them. In that sense, scandals prove advantageous.
- Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.The followin 83
- The following appeared in the summary of a study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia."Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates, 70
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.Write a response in wh 93
- If you were am employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire: an inexperienced worker at a lower salary or an experienced worker at a higher salary? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 78
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with therecommendation and explain 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
Scandals comprise of accusations, gossips or allegations whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 795, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arge though, requires a good analysis by critically examining the types of scanda...
^^
Line 1, column 919, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...of them had, on the public consciousness . Mostly, scandals benefit the public...
^^
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'prove'.
Suggestion: prove
... scandals benefit the public. The media proves to be an asset in this case as they hel...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...ey help us be aware and concerned. Many a times, scandals reform the way a system works...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 983, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m a halcyon torpor and unmask the truth, making us awared citizens. They help cau...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'while', 'as for', 'for instance', 'of course']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252165543792 0.238963963785 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.138594802695 0.154291517835 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0846968238691 0.0886310499679 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0384985563041 0.0506014161523 76% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0365736284889 0.0449626384858 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118383060635 0.123526278965 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0307988450433 0.0379742944744 81% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85109961282 2.82910677849 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0202117420597 0.0316879551592 64% => OK
Particles: 0.00577478344562 0.0014075125626 410% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.138594802695 0.0950106342287 146% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0163618864293 0.0245489744465 67% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0125120307988 0.0157978311181 79% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 5679.0 2899.98275862 196% => OK
No of words: 933.0 478.390804598 195% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08681672026 6.0591788892 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.52675752124 4.65681771538 119% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.374062165059 0.369966551584 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.275455519829 0.285172536893 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203644158628 0.207245337619 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127545551983 0.136322040163 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85109961282 2.82910677849 101% => OK
Unique words: 459.0 234.298850575 196% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491961414791 0.492565540709 100% => OK
Word variations: 69.2873447406 56.8184620615 122% => OK
How many sentences: 44.0 21.1264367816 208% => Less sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 21.2045454545 23.7468607788 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9839124327 62.0618507366 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.068181818 143.81877709 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2045454545 23.7468607788 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.272727272727 0.728815259664 37% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.87931034483 102% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.71264367816 78% => OK
Readability: 48.7500974374 52.2641144681 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.87837837838 1.64547068916 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33707910613 0.39480681544 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.101702474702 0.11556216369 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0726223468722 0.0736162880345 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.504690842241 0.531340600358 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.184657048755 0.15197228837 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134435549927 0.158818324754 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498815467235 0.0851127212816 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.647240263903 0.388921930462 166% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.019116269141 0.0677916285025 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269463853941 0.28015025965 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323925918108 0.0610219844235 53% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.8591954023 120% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 27.0 5.30459770115 509% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.96264367816 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.10632183908 148% => OK
Negative topic words: 22.0 3.93390804598 559% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.04597701149 33% => OK
Total topic words: 35.0 15.0862068966 232% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 58.0 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 3.5 Out of 6