Scandals Whether it is in politics, academic or other areas can be useful. They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
In general , I agree with assertion that scandals whether it is in politics , academic or other area draw too much attention to publics which are involved in that area and also to general public. Most of general people interested in scandals in politics. Many of the scandals are shown to newspapers , news channels, radio etc.
Scandals are most likely to be interested other than speakers or reformer. Scandals are providing us to details what’s happening in politics, academic or some areas. Scandals shown in social media very useful to public. Through social media public aware of scandals. Scandals have interesting stories which general public liked to hear. They give us to information about fraud of any area. It does suggest being aware from those. Scandals are born from the corruption, fraud or any illegal act opposite the law or government. Corruption most likely to happen in politics.
On other hand speaker or reformer is not draw too much attention to public. They have banal speech. Some speakers repeated over and over rephrased ideas. Reformers are as Speakers.
Is sum, I agree that scandals are better express political or social problems than Reformers or Speakers can.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-24 | brijeshshah41 | 66 | view |
| 2019-02-24 | brijeshshah41 | 16 | view |
| 2016-10-21 | Vaibhav1214 | 16 | view |
| 2016-08-12 | bhargav006 | 41 | view |
- sports stars and movie stars should an obligation to younger people who follow them.they earned million of dollars. they should encourage people to give in society responsibility. 50
- Scandals Whether it is in politics, academic or other areas can be useful. They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 41
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
In general , I agree with assertion that scandals wh...
^^
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... that scandals whether it is in politics , academic or other area draw too much ...
^^
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is in politics , academic or other area draw too much attention to publics whic...
^^
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... politics , academic or other area draw too much attention to publics which are ...
^^
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...h are involved in that area and also to general public. Most of general people interested in s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of the scandals are shown to newspapers , news channels, radio etc. Scandals are...
^^
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...Scandals have interesting stories which general public liked to hear. They give us to informat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I agree that scandals are better express political or social problems than Reform...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'so', 'in general']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251121076233 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.14798206278 0.157235817809 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.143497757848 0.0880659088768 163% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0313901345291 0.0497285424764 63% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0358744394619 0.0444667217837 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121076233184 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0403587443946 0.0406280797675 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61085222326 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0448430493274 0.030933414821 145% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0403587443946 0.0997080785238 40% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00448430493274 0.0249443105267 18% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0134529147982 0.0148568991511 91% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1206.0 2732.02544248 44% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 198.0 452.878318584 44% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09090909091 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.58838876751 82% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.383838383838 0.366273622748 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.313131313131 0.280924506359 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.227272727273 0.200843997647 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.126262626263 0.132149295362 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61085222326 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 219.290929204 50% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550505050505 0.48968727796 112% => OK
Word variations: 49.4471895133 55.4138127331 89% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 11.6470588235 23.380412469 50% => Sentence lengths are too short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5116381611 59.4972553346 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.9411764706 141.124799967 50% => OK
Words per sentence: 11.6470588235 23.380412469 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 0.176470588235 0.674092028746 26% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 42.9601901367 51.4728631049 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.91666666667 1.64882698954 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362503169961 0.391690518653 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.122890169605 0.123202303941 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.118249689735 0.077325440228 153% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.46120230704 0.547984918172 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.193667074509 0.149214159877 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115216189312 0.161403998019 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965852108663 0.0892212321368 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.267500088091 0.385218514788 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.140757191956 0.0692045440612 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231065922632 0.275328986314 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476927725303 0.0653680567796 73% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.4325221239 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 7.22455752212 14% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 13.5995575221 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.