Schools should cut funding for extracurricular activities such as sports and arts when school buildings are in need of repair.
The school plays an important role in a student's life and it also has its effect on the future of the student and the country. Hence, it is their responsibility to take every step cautiously because a modicum mistake in the decision of the school will do greater harm overall on the future of the student. Here, I am against the prompt that is schools should not cut the funding for extra-curricular activities such as sports and arts when school buildings need repair.
The reduction in the funding of extracurricular activities just because school is in a need of repair, the schools have no right to do that. Because, first of all, the parents pay a huge amount of fees for all the different activities which are carried by the school. So, it will be an injustice to the students and parents for not giving proper resources to the students in every aspect.
Further, some of the students may want to follow their dreams in the extracurricular activities like sports, music, arts, etc., which the school thinks is irrelevant may the students are highly dependent upon it. Besides, these extracurricular activities are also beneficial in the long run which helps the students mentally and physically. On the contrary, if a person is not healthy enough then he cannot take part in any of the daily activities.
Though, if a part of the school is not in good condition and not safe for the students, then it is highly recommended to look upon this as the safety of the students is the priority. So, it is the first thing to do by the schools. The parents trusted the school and sent them with a feeling that their child is safe there and the students' lives cannot be risked just because of the lack of money. Schools should ask for some extra money from the parents or can cut off the salary of the teachers for the repair of the school building.
In conclusion, the extracurricular activities are as important as any of the subjects like maths, physics, etc. So, it is not the only way to repair the school by cutting off the funding of extracurricular activities to repair the school. Schools should think of some other way to collect funding and repair it as soon as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | Apollo100 | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | Shashwat Singh | 50 | view |
| 2018-07-28 | coldplayer | 83 | view |
- Schools should cut funding for extracurricular activities such as sports and arts when school buildings are in need of repair. 50
- If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience. 50
- People should question the rule of authority as opposed to accepting them passively. 50
- If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified the job should go to the applicant with more experience 43
- A recent study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that employees with paid sick leave are 28 % less likely to be involved in a work-related accident than employees who do not receive payment for sick leave. Researchers hypothesize the 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...The school plays an important role in a students life and it also has its effect on the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...he students in every aspect. Further, some of the students may want to follow their dream...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, if, look, may, so, then, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6511627907 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73420424332 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454780361757 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0665022526 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1875 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.507179578046 0.243740707755 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174098939433 0.0831039109588 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189393585879 0.0758088955206 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294718921935 0.150359130593 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121186223275 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 48.8420337079 131% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.