Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
I don't agree with the outright declaration statement declares that science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society's problems. However, I do tend to agree that science and technology would help and resolve a larger extent of problems any society faces.
At the outset, I would say that science and technology help resolve many predicaments humanity faces from day to day affairs to the large-scale issues e.g. from helping in cooking to resolve large-scale power needs. But on the other hand there are several issues which all societies have been facing and debating on from eternity. These issues include moral issues, human rights, societal discriminations, distribution of wealth, religious beliefs, regional conflicts and so on. Science and technology may help humanity with tasks related to routine, day to day affairs, enhancement of knowledge, research and discoveries; but the technology fails when it comes to political, social, economic and humanitarian issues.
In my opinion wherever emotional or soft side of humanity is involved, technological and scientific interventions have minimum bearings and these issues have been points of conflict and problematic since the beginning of humanity and may remain unresolved at a comprehensive level until the end of the world.
Hence, although science and technology provide resolutions and will continue to resolve a large number of problems faced by humanity or societies, but they are not answer to all the issues being faced by humanity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 33 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | qwertyy | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-28 | David Okenwa | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | najaf | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | hello_kratnesh101 | 33 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership 83
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 51
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
I dont agree with the outright declaration sta...
^^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'predicaments'' or 'predicament's'?
Suggestion: predicaments'; predicament's
...cience and technology help resolve many predicaments humanity faces from day to day affairs ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...esolutions and will continue to resolve a large number of problems faced by humanity or societies...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., hence, however, if, may, so, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 238.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40756302521 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95672062913 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600840336134 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.4788714287 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.875 118.986275619 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.21951772744 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377428707002 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167899791832 0.0831039109588 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155378001794 0.0758088955206 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238704633389 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180099467049 0.0667264976115 270% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.